Featured On
A trader-filed complaint referenced FSC Ref: A7IGOC is currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission — the regulator overseeing one of XM's operating entities. The complaint concerns an unresolved fund dispute the trader escalated after XM's support did not address it internally. As of this review, the case remains open with no published resolution.
XM Group was founded in 2009 and has grown into a globally recognised forex and CFD broker. Its main regulated entity operates under CySEC in Cyprus, a top-tier authority. It also runs offshore entities under the Financial Services Commission in Belize and Mauritius. This multi-entity structure lets it serve clients worldwide, but the level of protection depends heavily on which entity holds your account.
Andorran traders are typically routed to XM's offshore entity because the principality lacks a local forex/CFD licensing regime. The AFA Andorra supervises banking and investment services within Andorra, but it does not authorise or oversee leveraged CFD brokers like XM. As a result, local residents are onboarded under Belize or Mauritius rules, where protections are weaker and cross-border enforcement is limited.
The regulatory score remains comparatively high at 4.0/5 because XM's CySEC licence is genuine and actively supervised in Cyprus. However, that score is marked down due to the active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC), which signals an unresolved fund dispute. Complaint volume and severity sit low at 1.3/5, and resolution reliability is 2.0/5, reflecting that 61% of withdrawal complaints remain unresolved after 30+ days. Andorran users should note that the high regulatory score applies to the CySEC entity, not necessarily the offshore one they may be assigned to.
The most significant entry in XM's regulatory ledger is the active Belize FSC investigation (Ref A7IGOC), an unresolved fund dispute that has been escalated to the regulator. This is more serious than a simple delay because it indicates a formal, ongoing review. Account lockout and deletion complaints are also severe: they cut off access entirely, leaving no recovery path. By contrast, withdrawal delays alone, while frustrating, are less damaging than losing access to your account or funds altogether.
Independent fraud-monitoring reports have flagged "XM Saham Investment" as a separate, fraudulent operation suspected of misusing XM's name and branding to promote fake investment schemes on Facebook, Instagram, and Telegram. This is not XM Group — it is a clone impersonation scam that trades on a legitimate broker's reputation to mislead investors.
If you were contacted via social media with guaranteed-return promises using XM's name, this is very likely the clone scam, not the real broker. Always verify you're on XM's official domain and never send funds based on a social-media investment pitch.
| Entity | Regulator | Tier | Protection |
|---|---|---|---|
| XM Group (EU) Ltd | CySEC | Top-tier | ICF up to €20,000 |
| Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd | FSC Belize | Offshore | No compensation scheme — site of the active complaint |
| XM Global Limited | FSC Mauritius | Offshore | No compensation scheme |
For Andorran residents, XM typically assigns accounts to its offshore entity, either FSC Belize or FSC Mauritius. These entities operate under lighter regulatory frameworks than CySEC. The active complaint under investigation by the Belize FSC directly involves that offshore arm. Andorra's own regulator, the AFA, does not oversee XM, so local traders have no domestic recourse if a dispute arises with the offshore entity.
Protection differences are material. CySEC-regulated accounts benefit from stricter capital requirements, segregated client funds, and participation in investor compensation schemes. Offshore entities under Belize or Mauritius do not offer the same safeguards. Andorran traders should verify which entity their account is with before depositing, as the level of protection and the complaints pattern differ significantly between them.
The documented lockout pattern is a serious concern: after 2FA or email issues, some users report being locked out with no recovery path, described as 'one strike and you're out.' At least one case involved full account deletion after a dispute. For Andorran traders, who rely on cross-border access and may use local banking or crypto deposits, such lockouts can be especially disruptive because resolving them requires dealing with an offshore entity with limited local accountability.
If you lose access, act quickly: gather all correspondence, transaction records, and screenshots. Contact XM support through multiple channels and keep a written log. If unresolved, you can escalate to the Belize FSC, referencing any complaint number like A7IGOC. Andorran traders should also consider whether their account is with the CySEC entity, which may offer better escalation routes. Do not rely solely on social media contacts, as clone scams exist.
Not every independent source frames XM this negatively. BrokerChooser, a professional broker-review site that states it tracks 40,000+ brokers, currently assesses XM as "a legit broker" with "a clean track record" and "no major incidents," based on its regulatory tier and testing. We're including this for balance: reasonable, independent assessors can reach a more favorable overall conclusion than this file does — our file weights the active regulatory complaint and account-lockout pattern more heavily than a general safety assessment would.
| Broker | Regulatory | Complaint Severity | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| XM Group | 4 | 1.3 | 2 |
| Pepperstone | 4.9 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| IC Markets | 4.6 | 4.1 | 4.3 |
For Andorran traders, XM Group presents a mixed picture. Its CySEC-regulated arm is genuinely supervised and independent reviewer BrokerChooser assesses XM as 'legit' with a clean track record. However, the active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) and the pattern of account lockouts, withdrawal delays, and at least one account deletion raise real concerns. Since Andorran clients are typically routed to the offshore entity, they face weaker protections and limited local recourse. No fraud is confirmed, but the unresolved issues warrant caution.
Practical recommendations for Andorran traders: confirm which entity holds your account before depositing. If it is the Belize or Mauritius entity, be aware of the elevated risks and keep thorough records of all transactions. Use smaller initial deposits, test withdrawals early, and avoid relying on social media contacts that may be clone scams. If a dispute arises, escalate promptly to the relevant regulator and consider the CySEC entity for stronger safeguards.