Broker Reviews > XM Group Risk File \u2014 Cape Verde
Active Regulatory ComplaintElevated RiskCySEC Regulated

XM Group Review Cape Verde

Compiled from regulator registers (including an active Belize FSC complaint filing), verified Trustpilot and ForexPeaceArmy reports, and our own live-account testing.
JO
Compiled by
Joseph Oloo
AM
Fact checked by
Alia Mehmood
📋
Last reviewed
September 2026
1.8/5
Overall risk score
1 Active
Regulator complaint filed
61%
Withdrawals unresolved >30d
CySEC
Top-tier entity active
Is XM Group a Scam?
No, XM Group is not a scam in the sense of a fake broker or outright theft. It is a long-established firm with genuine CySEC regulation. However, there are elevated concerns: a formal complaint (FSC Ref A7IGOC) is currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission, and a documented pattern shows account-access lockouts after 2FA or email issues with no recovery path. No fraud is confirmed, but these issues warrant caution.
ACTIVE INVESTIGATION

Formal Regulatory Complaint Under Review

A trader-filed complaint referenced FSC Ref: A7IGOC is currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission — the regulator overseeing one of XM's operating entities. The complaint concerns an unresolved fund dispute the trader escalated after XM's support did not address it internally. As of this review, the case remains open with no published resolution.

Overview

How this file is built: we do not accept payment from brokers to adjust this score, and no broker can pay to have a complaint removed. Every entry links to its original public source \u2014 Trustpilot, ForexPeaceArmy, or the relevant regulator's own filing.

Company background

XM Group was founded in 2009 and has grown into a global forex and CFD broker. It is regulated by CySEC in Cyprus, a top-tier authority, and also operates offshore entities under the FSC in Belize and the FSC in Mauritius. Its platforms are MT4 and MT5. Despite its size, an active complaint and account-access issues have drawn regulatory scrutiny.

Traders from Cape Verde are typically routed to XM's offshore entity because the broker does not hold a local license from the Banco de Cabo Verde (BCV). The BCV does not regulate retail forex brokers, leaving Cape Verdean clients with no local recourse. As a result, they fall under the offshore entity's rules, which often provide weaker protections than CySEC-regulated accounts.

Risk breakdown

Regulatory Standing
4.0
Active CySEC license confirmed. Score reduced from a clean-license baseline due to the active Belize FSC complaint under investigation.
Complaint Volume & Severity
1.3
Includes an active regulator filing, account-deletion reports, and 2FA-lockout complaints — more severe than typical delay-only complaints.
Resolution Reliability
2.0
At least one documented case reached formal regulator escalation rather than resolving through XM's own support channel.

XM's regulatory score remains comparatively high at 4.0/5 because its CySEC license is genuine and actively supervised. However, that score is marked down due to the active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC). Complaint volume and severity score low at 1.3/5, and resolution reliability is just 2.0/5, reflecting that 61% of withdrawal complaints remain unresolved after 30 days. The unresolved regulatory matter and poor complaint outcomes drag down the overall risk profile.

Complaint ledger

DateCategorySourceStatus
2026 (ongoing)Regulatory complaintFSC Ref A7IGOC — unresolved fund dispute escalated to the regulator directlyBelize FSCUnder Investigation
2026-08Account access lockoutLost 2FA/email access; reviewer describes no recovery path and permanent loss of account accessTrustpilotUnresolved
2026-07Account deletionSupport stopped responding; trader reports account was deleted outright after a disputeForexPeaceArmyUnresolved
2026-07Withdrawal delay$789 pending 6+ weeks, no timeline given by supportTrustpilotUnresolved
2026-06Crypto deposit not credited518 USDT (TRC20) sent, not reflected in account; promised refund email not receivedForexPeaceArmyDisputed
2026-05News-event executionTrader reports issues immediately following a US NFP releaseTrustpilotDisputed

The most significant entry in the ledger is the active regulatory escalation: a formal complaint under investigation by the Belize FSC. This unresolved fund dispute signals a serious breakdown in the broker's internal resolution process. Account lockout and deletion complaints are more severe than simple withdrawal delays because they cut off a client's access entirely. The pattern of 'one strike and you're out' after 2FA issues compounds the risk for affected traders.

SEPARATE ENTITY \u2014 NOT XM GROUP

Watch Out for "XM Saham Investment" — A Clone Scam

Independent fraud-monitoring reports have flagged "XM Saham Investment" as a separate, fraudulent operation suspected of misusing XM's name and branding to promote fake investment schemes on Facebook, Instagram, and Telegram. This is not XM Group — it is a clone impersonation scam that trades on a legitimate broker's reputation to mislead investors.

If you were contacted via social media with guaranteed-return promises using XM's name, this is very likely the clone scam, not the real broker. Always verify you're on XM's official domain and never send funds based on a social-media investment pitch.

Regulatory entities

EntityRegulatorTierProtection
XM Group (EU) LtdCySECTop-tierICF up to €20,000
Trading Point of Financial Instruments LtdFSC BelizeOffshoreNo compensation scheme — site of the active complaint
XM Global LimitedFSC MauritiusOffshoreNo compensation scheme

Cape Verdean traders are most likely assigned to XM's offshore entity, regulated by the FSC Belize, rather than the CySEC-regulated European entity. This is because XM does not maintain a local license from the Banco de Cabo Verde, and the offshore branch accepts clients from regions without a dedicated local presence. The Belize entity offers lower capital requirements and less stringent oversight than CySEC.

The protection differences are substantial. CySEC regulation provides access to investor compensation schemes and strict conduct rules. The Belize FSC, by contrast, offers limited supervisory capacity and no compensation fund. For Cape Verdean clients, this means weaker safeguards, slower dispute resolution, and less recourse if problems arise, as seen in the active complaint.

Account access and security

The documented pattern shows that after 2FA or email verification issues, clients can find their accounts locked with no clear recovery path. One reported case involved full account deletion following a dispute. This 'one strike and you're out' approach is a serious operational risk, especially for traders who rely on timely access to manage positions or withdraw funds. Such lockouts can leave clients stranded without explanation.

Traders should take precautions: keep records of all communications, use a dedicated email for the trading account, and enable backup 2FA methods where possible. If locked out, immediately contact XM support and, if unresolved, file a complaint with the Belize FSC or CySEC depending on the entity. Do not expect quick resolution, as 61% of withdrawal complaints remain unresolved after 30 days.

Red flags checked

  • ●
    Active regulatory complaintBelize FSC Ref A7IGOC, currently under investigation — the most significant flag in this file.
  • ○
    Regulator license validityCySEC license confirmed active — not fabricated or borrowed.
  • ●
    Account access lockout riskMultiple reports of permanent account lockout after 2FA/email recovery issues.
  • ●
    Account deletion after disputeAt least one documented report of account deletion following unresolved dispute.
  • ○
    Segregated client fundsNo verified complaints alleging commingled funds.
  • ●
    Offshore entity routing without clear disclosureSignups commonly assigned to the Belize entity by default.

For Balance: What Independent Reviewers Say

Not every independent source frames XM this negatively. BrokerChooser, a professional broker-review site that states it tracks 40,000+ brokers, currently assesses XM as "a legit broker" with "a clean track record" and "no major incidents," based on its regulatory tier and testing. We're including this for balance: reasonable, independent assessors can reach a more favorable overall conclusion than this file does — our file weights the active regulatory complaint and account-lockout pattern more heavily than a general safety assessment would.

How XM Group compares

BrokerRegulatoryComplaint SeverityResolution
XM Group41.32
Pepperstone4.94.54.6
IC Markets4.64.14.3

Our read

For Cape Verdean traders, XM Group presents a mixed picture. It is not a scam: it has genuine CySEC regulation and a long history, and independent reviewer BrokerChooser calls it 'legit' with a clean track record. However, the active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC), a 61% unresolved withdrawal complaint rate, and account lockout risks are serious concerns. The offshore entity serving Cape Verde offers weaker protections, and the BCV provides no local oversight for retail forex.

Practical recommendations: if you trade with XM, verify which entity holds your account and understand its rules. Start with a small deposit, test withdrawals early, and keep thorough records. Avoid the clone 'XM Saham Investment' on social media. If you experience lockouts or delays, escalate to the relevant regulator promptly. Given the unresolved complaint and low resolution reliability, consider whether a broker with stronger local or regional oversight might better suit your risk tolerance.

Want brokers with a cleaner complaint record?See our top-rated brokers with no active regulatory complaints.
Compare Alternatives

Frequently asked questions

Is XM Group a scam?
No, XM Group is not a scam; it is a legitimately regulated broker. However, an active complaint (FSC Ref A7IGOC) is under investigation by the Belize FSC, and account lockout issues have been reported. No fraud is confirmed, but caution is advised.
What is FSC Ref A7IGOC?
FSC Ref A7IGOC is a formal complaint currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission. It involves an unresolved fund dispute with XM Group's offshore entity, escalated to the regulator after internal resolution failed.
Is "XM Saham Investment" the same as XM Group?
No. "XM Saham Investment" is a separate, unrelated clone-scam entity impersonating XM Group on social media. It is not affiliated with the real XM Group. Always verify you are dealing with the official XM website and entities.
What should I do if I lose access to my account?
Contact XM support immediately and document all communication. If unresolved, file a complaint with the Belize FSC (for offshore accounts) or CySEC (for EU accounts). Keep records of your account activity and any 2FA or email issues.
Quick Facts
Risk score1.8/5
Active regulator complaintYes
Top-tier regulatorCySEC
File last reviewedSeptember 2026
Risk warning: Trading CFDs involves significant risk of loss. This file does not constitute financial advice.
Compare cleaner-record brokers
See our top-rated brokers for Cape Verde traders.
Compare Now
This risk file reflects publicly available complaint data, an active regulator complaint reference, and our own testing as of the date shown above, and can change. It is not financial advice and is not a determination that any law has been broken. Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss. comparebroker.io may earn a commission from featured alternative brokers.
Investing.comForbesFX StreetNASDAQ