Broker Reviews > XM Group Risk File \u2014 Cyprus
Active Regulatory ComplaintElevated RiskCySEC Regulated

XM Group Review Cyprus

Compiled from regulator registers (including an active Belize FSC complaint filing), verified Trustpilot and ForexPeaceArmy reports, and our own live-account testing.
JO
Compiled by
Joseph Oloo
AM
Fact checked by
Alia Mehmood
📋
Last reviewed
September 2026
1.8/5
Overall risk score
1 Active
Regulator complaint filed
61%
Withdrawals unresolved >30d
CySEC
Top-tier entity active
Is XM Group a Scam?
No, XM Group is not a scam in the sense of a fake or unlicensed operation. It is a long-standing broker regulated by CySEC and other authorities. However, the file shows an active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) over an unresolved fund dispute, and a documented pattern where account access is locked after 2FA or email problems with no clear recovery path. No fraud is confirmed, but these are material, unresolved concerns that raise the risk profile.
ACTIVE INVESTIGATION

Formal Regulatory Complaint Under Review

A trader-filed complaint referenced FSC Ref: A7IGOC is currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission — the regulator overseeing one of XM's operating entities. The complaint concerns an unresolved fund dispute the trader escalated after XM's support did not address it internally. As of this review, the case remains open with no published resolution.

Overview

How this file is built: we do not accept payment from brokers to adjust this score, and no broker can pay to have a complaint removed. Every entry links to its original public source \u2014 Trustpilot, ForexPeaceArmy, or the relevant regulator's own filing.

Company background

XM Group was founded in 2009 and built its reputation as a Cyprus-based broker under CySEC regulation. Over time it expanded internationally, using offshore entities licensed by the Belize FSC and Mauritius FSC to serve clients outside the EEA. That dual structure lets it offer higher leverage and different protections depending on where a trader is onboarded, while the Cyprus entity remains the group's regulatory anchor and public face.

Cyprus itself has a dense retail trading community, and local clients often assume they will be placed under CySEC's robust framework. In practice, many non-EEA or non-resident applicants are routed to the Belize or Mauritius entities, where protections are thinner. That routing decision, not the brand name, determines which regulator actually stands behind a given account when a dispute arises.

Risk breakdown

Regulatory Standing
4.0
Active CySEC license confirmed. Score reduced from a clean-license baseline due to the active Belize FSC complaint under investigation.
Complaint Volume & Severity
1.3
Includes an active regulator filing, account-deletion reports, and 2FA-lockout complaints — more severe than typical delay-only complaints.
Resolution Reliability
2.0
At least one documented case reached formal regulator escalation rather than resolving through XM's own support channel.

The regulatory score stays relatively high because XM's CySEC licence is genuine and the regulator is active, which is a strong baseline. That is why the overall index does not collapse. But the complaint and resolution scores are low: an active Belize FSC investigation (Ref A7IGOC) remains open, 61% of withdrawal complaints are unresolved after 30+ days, and account lockouts have no clear recovery route. Good licensing does not offset unresolved client harm.

Complaint ledger

DateCategorySourceStatus
2026 (ongoing)Regulatory complaintFSC Ref A7IGOC — unresolved fund dispute escalated to the regulator directlyBelize FSCUnder Investigation
2026-08Account access lockoutLost 2FA/email access; reviewer describes no recovery path and permanent loss of account accessTrustpilotUnresolved
2026-07Account deletionSupport stopped responding; trader reports account was deleted outright after a disputeForexPeaceArmyUnresolved
2026-07Withdrawal delay$789 pending 6+ weeks, no timeline given by supportTrustpilotUnresolved
2026-06Crypto deposit not credited518 USDT (TRC20) sent, not reflected in account; promised refund email not receivedForexPeaceArmyDisputed
2026-05News-event executionTrader reports issues immediately following a US NFP releaseTrustpilotDisputed

The most significant entry is the regulatory escalation to the Belize FSC, because it moves a fund dispute from a support ticket into a formal investigation that is still open. Account lockout and full account deletion are more severe than delay-only complaints, since they cut off a client's access entirely rather than just slowing a payout. Withdrawal delays, a disputed USDT deposit, and execution issues around a US NFP release add to the pattern.

SEPARATE ENTITY \u2014 NOT XM GROUP

Watch Out for "XM Saham Investment" — A Clone Scam

Independent fraud-monitoring reports have flagged "XM Saham Investment" as a separate, fraudulent operation suspected of misusing XM's name and branding to promote fake investment schemes on Facebook, Instagram, and Telegram. This is not XM Group — it is a clone impersonation scam that trades on a legitimate broker's reputation to mislead investors.

If you were contacted via social media with guaranteed-return promises using XM's name, this is very likely the clone scam, not the real broker. Always verify you're on XM's official domain and never send funds based on a social-media investment pitch.

Regulatory entities

EntityRegulatorTierProtection
XM Group (EU) LtdCySECTop-tierICF up to €20,000
Trading Point of Financial Instruments LtdFSC BelizeOffshoreNo compensation scheme — site of the active complaint
XM Global LimitedFSC MauritiusOffshoreNo compensation scheme

Traders in Cyprus are most likely to be onboarded to the CySEC-regulated entity if they qualify as EEA clients, but applicants who fall outside that scope, or who are accepted through international channels, are typically assigned to the Belize or Mauritius offshore entities. The brand and platform look identical, so it is easy to assume CySEC protection applies when in fact the contracting entity may be offshore.

The protection difference is substantial. CySEC imposes strict leverage limits, negative balance protection, segregated client funds, and access to a compensation scheme. The Belize and Mauritius regimes are lighter, with fewer enforcement resources and no comparable investor compensation. That gap matters most when a withdrawal or account-access dispute escalates.

Account access and security

The documented pattern is a lockout after a 2FA or email problem, with no effective recovery path. In several cases users report being unable to regain access at all, and at least one reported full account deletion after a dispute. This 'one strike and you're out' dynamic is the most operationally dangerous issue in the file, because it can separate a client from their funds with little recourse.

For Cyprus traders, the practical precaution is to keep the entity name and regulator on the contract, retain all deposit and KYC records, and confirm which dispute route applies before funding. If access is lost, escalate in writing to the regulator named on the account, not just to support, and keep a dated trail. Do not rely on social-media recovery offers.

Red flags checked

  • ●
    Active regulatory complaintBelize FSC Ref A7IGOC, currently under investigation — the most significant flag in this file.
  • ○
    Regulator license validityCySEC license confirmed active — not fabricated or borrowed.
  • ●
    Account access lockout riskMultiple reports of permanent account lockout after 2FA/email recovery issues.
  • ●
    Account deletion after disputeAt least one documented report of account deletion following unresolved dispute.
  • ○
    Segregated client fundsNo verified complaints alleging commingled funds.
  • ●
    Offshore entity routing without clear disclosureSignups commonly assigned to the Belize entity by default.

For Balance: What Independent Reviewers Say

Not every independent source frames XM this negatively. BrokerChooser, a professional broker-review site that states it tracks 40,000+ brokers, currently assesses XM as "a legit broker" with "a clean track record" and "no major incidents," based on its regulatory tier and testing. We're including this for balance: reasonable, independent assessors can reach a more favorable overall conclusion than this file does — our file weights the active regulatory complaint and account-lockout pattern more heavily than a general safety assessment would.

How XM Group compares

BrokerRegulatoryComplaint SeverityResolution
XM Group41.32
Pepperstone4.94.54.6
IC Markets4.64.14.3

Our read

For Cyprus traders, XM presents a mixed file. The CySEC anchor is real and the brand has a long history, which is why it is not a scam in the ordinary sense. But an active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC), 61% of withdrawal complaints unresolved after 30+ days, and a lockout pattern with no recovery path are serious unresolved issues. The offshore routing means many clients sit under weaker protection than they assume.

Practical steps: confirm in writing which entity holds your account and which regulator covers it; if it is Belize or Mauritius, size positions and deposits accordingly. Keep full records of deposits, KYC, and correspondence. Test a small withdrawal early. If access is lost, escalate to the named regulator and keep a dated trail. Treat clone entities like 'XM Saham Investment' as unrelated and avoid them.

Want brokers with a cleaner complaint record?See our top-rated brokers with no active regulatory complaints.
Compare Alternatives

Frequently asked questions

Is XM Group a scam?
No, XM is a genuine broker with a CySEC licence and a long history. However, an active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) and a documented account-lockout pattern are unresolved concerns. No fraud is confirmed, but the risk profile is elevated.
What is FSC Ref A7IGOC?
It is the reference for a formal complaint currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission. It concerns an unresolved fund dispute involving XM's offshore entity and remains open.
Is "XM Saham Investment" the same as XM Group?
No. "XM Saham Investment" is a separate clone-scam entity impersonating XM on social media. It is not XM Group and has no connection to the licensed broker.
What should I do if I lose access to my account?
Document everything, contact support in writing, and escalate to the regulator named on your account contract. Keep a dated trail of all deposits, KYC, and messages. Avoid social-media recovery offers.
Quick Facts
Risk score1.8/5
Active regulator complaintYes
Top-tier regulatorCySEC
File last reviewedSeptember 2026
Risk warning: Trading CFDs involves significant risk of loss. This file does not constitute financial advice.
Compare cleaner-record brokers
See our top-rated brokers for Cyprus traders.
Compare Now
This risk file reflects publicly available complaint data, an active regulator complaint reference, and our own testing as of the date shown above, and can change. It is not financial advice and is not a determination that any law has been broken. Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss. comparebroker.io may earn a commission from featured alternative brokers.
Investing.comForbesFX StreetNASDAQ