Broker Reviews > XM Group Risk File \u2014 Malta
Active Regulatory ComplaintElevated RiskCySEC Regulated

XM Group Review Malta

Compiled from regulator registers (including an active Belize FSC complaint filing), verified Trustpilot and ForexPeaceArmy reports, and our own live-account testing.
JO
Compiled by
Joseph Oloo
AM
Fact checked by
Alia Mehmood
📋
Last reviewed
September 2026
1.8/5
Overall risk score
1 Active
Regulator complaint filed
61%
Withdrawals unresolved >30d
CySEC
Top-tier entity active
Is XM Group a Scam?
Based on the available evidence, XM Group is not a confirmed scam, but the active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) and a documented pattern of account-access lockouts after 2FA/email issues are serious concerns. These issues elevate risk, though no fraud, fund theft, or fabricated licenses have been verified. Independent reviewers like BrokerChooser still assess XM as legitimate. Maltese traders should weigh the unresolved complaint and recovery difficulties against XM's otherwise solid regulatory standing under CySEC.
ACTIVE INVESTIGATION

Formal Regulatory Complaint Under Review

A trader-filed complaint referenced FSC Ref: A7IGOC is currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission — the regulator overseeing one of XM's operating entities. The complaint concerns an unresolved fund dispute the trader escalated after XM's support did not address it internally. As of this review, the case remains open with no published resolution.

Overview

How this file is built: we do not accept payment from brokers to adjust this score, and no broker can pay to have a complaint removed. Every entry links to its original public source \u2014 Trustpilot, ForexPeaceArmy, or the relevant regulator's own filing.

Company background

XM Group was founded in 2009 and has grown into a global broker offering forex and CFDs on MT4 and MT5. Its main regulated entity is licensed by CySEC in Cyprus, a top-tier European regulator. However, XM also operates offshore entities under the Belize FSC and Mauritius FSC, which typically offer lighter oversight and fewer investor protections.

Maltese traders are often routed to XM's offshore entities because these allow higher leverage and flexible onboarding, but they fall outside the MFSA's direct supervision. While Malta has a strong financial regulator in the MFSA, XM's CySEC license does not automatically extend MFSA protections to Maltese residents, leaving them reliant on the offshore entity's framework.

Risk breakdown

Regulatory Standing
4.0
Active CySEC license confirmed. Score reduced from a clean-license baseline due to the active Belize FSC complaint under investigation.
Complaint Volume & Severity
1.3
Includes an active regulator filing, account-deletion reports, and 2FA-lockout complaints — more severe than typical delay-only complaints.
Resolution Reliability
2.0
At least one documented case reached formal regulator escalation rather than resolving through XM's own support channel.

XM's regulatory score remains comparatively high at 4.0/5 because its CySEC license is genuinely active and enforced, reflecting real oversight. However, the score is marked down by the ongoing Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC), which signals unresolved fund disputes. Complaint volume and severity score low at 1.3/5, and resolution reliability is just 2.0/5, with 61% of withdrawal complaints unresolved after 30+ days. This gap between solid regulation and poor complaint outcomes drives the overall risk profile for Maltese traders.

Complaint ledger

DateCategorySourceStatus
2026 (ongoing)Regulatory complaintFSC Ref A7IGOC — unresolved fund dispute escalated to the regulator directlyBelize FSCUnder Investigation
2026-08Account access lockoutLost 2FA/email access; reviewer describes no recovery path and permanent loss of account accessTrustpilotUnresolved
2026-07Account deletionSupport stopped responding; trader reports account was deleted outright after a disputeForexPeaceArmyUnresolved
2026-07Withdrawal delay$789 pending 6+ weeks, no timeline given by supportTrustpilotUnresolved
2026-06Crypto deposit not credited518 USDT (TRC20) sent, not reflected in account; promised refund email not receivedForexPeaceArmyDisputed
2026-05News-event executionTrader reports issues immediately following a US NFP releaseTrustpilotDisputed

The most significant entry in the ledger is the active regulatory escalation to the Belize FSC, which indicates a formal, unresolved fund dispute. Account lockout and deletion complaints are more severe than simple withdrawal delays because they can leave traders with no access to their funds or trading history. While delay-only complaints may eventually resolve, lockouts with no recovery path pose a direct threat to account security and capital retrieval, especially for Maltese traders who may struggle to pursue cross-border complaints.

SEPARATE ENTITY \u2014 NOT XM GROUP

Watch Out for "XM Saham Investment" — A Clone Scam

Independent fraud-monitoring reports have flagged "XM Saham Investment" as a separate, fraudulent operation suspected of misusing XM's name and branding to promote fake investment schemes on Facebook, Instagram, and Telegram. This is not XM Group — it is a clone impersonation scam that trades on a legitimate broker's reputation to mislead investors.

If you were contacted via social media with guaranteed-return promises using XM's name, this is very likely the clone scam, not the real broker. Always verify you're on XM's official domain and never send funds based on a social-media investment pitch.

Regulatory entities

EntityRegulatorTierProtection
XM Group (EU) LtdCySECTop-tierICF up to €20,000
Trading Point of Financial Instruments LtdFSC BelizeOffshoreNo compensation scheme — site of the active complaint
XM Global LimitedFSC MauritiusOffshoreNo compensation scheme

Maltese traders are typically assigned to XM's offshore entity under the Belize FSC or Mauritius FSC, rather than the CySEC-regulated European entity. This is often due to higher leverage offerings and less restrictive onboarding, but it means they forgo the protections of the EU regulatory framework, including the MFSA's oversight, which would otherwise apply to locally licensed firms.

The protection differences are stark: CySEC-regulated entities must adhere to strict capital requirements, segregated client funds, and investor compensation schemes. Offshore entities under Belize or Mauritius have lighter rules, often no compensation scheme, and limited dispute resolution avenues. For Maltese traders, this means greater exposure to the account lockout and withdrawal issues documented in complaints.

Account access and security

The documented pattern of account-access lockouts after 2FA or email issues, with no recovery path, is a critical vulnerability. This 'one strike and you're out' approach can leave traders abruptly locked out, unable to withdraw funds or manage positions. At least one case involved full account deletion after a dispute, heightening the risk of permanent loss of access and capital.

Maltese traders should take precautions: enable all available security features, keep independent records of account activity, and use payment methods with chargeback options where possible. If locked out, immediately contact XM support and escalate to the relevant regulator—though for offshore entities, the Belize FSC is the primary avenue, and recovery may be slow or uncertain.

Red flags checked

  • ●
    Active regulatory complaintBelize FSC Ref A7IGOC, currently under investigation — the most significant flag in this file.
  • ○
    Regulator license validityCySEC license confirmed active — not fabricated or borrowed.
  • ●
    Account access lockout riskMultiple reports of permanent account lockout after 2FA/email recovery issues.
  • ●
    Account deletion after disputeAt least one documented report of account deletion following unresolved dispute.
  • ○
    Segregated client fundsNo verified complaints alleging commingled funds.
  • ●
    Offshore entity routing without clear disclosureSignups commonly assigned to the Belize entity by default.

For Balance: What Independent Reviewers Say

Not every independent source frames XM this negatively. BrokerChooser, a professional broker-review site that states it tracks 40,000+ brokers, currently assesses XM as "a legit broker" with "a clean track record" and "no major incidents," based on its regulatory tier and testing. We're including this for balance: reasonable, independent assessors can reach a more favorable overall conclusion than this file does — our file weights the active regulatory complaint and account-lockout pattern more heavily than a general safety assessment would.

How XM Group compares

BrokerRegulatoryComplaint SeverityResolution
XM Group41.32
Pepperstone4.94.54.6
IC Markets4.64.14.3

Our read

For Maltese traders, XM Group presents a mixed picture. The CySEC license and positive independent reviews like BrokerChooser's 'legit' assessment offer some reassurance. However, the active Belize FSC complaint, low resolution reliability, and severe account-access issues are red flags. With 61% of withdrawal complaints unresolved after 30+ days, the risk of frustrating and prolonged disputes is real. While not a confirmed scam, the offshore entity structure means Maltese traders have limited local recourse.

Practical recommendations: Maltese traders should prefer XM's CySEC-regulated entity if eligible, ensuring EU protections. If assigned offshore, start with small amounts, test withdrawals early, and avoid keeping large balances. Document all communications and consider spreading funds across regulated brokers. Stay alert to clone scams like 'XM Saham Investment' and verify any social media contact. Finally, weigh XM's competitive platforms against the unresolved complaint and recovery challenges.

Want brokers with a cleaner complaint record?See our top-rated brokers with no active regulatory complaints.
Compare Alternatives

Frequently asked questions

Is XM Group a scam?
No, XM Group is not a confirmed scam, but an active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) and account lockout issues are serious concerns. Independent reviews still consider it legitimate, though Maltese traders should be cautious.
What is FSC Ref A7IGOC?
FSC Ref A7IGOC is an active complaint under investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission. It involves an unresolved fund dispute with XM's offshore entity, highlighting potential risks for traders.
Is "XM Saham Investment" the same as XM Group?
No, 'XM Saham Investment' is a separate clone-scam impersonating XM on social media. It is not affiliated with XM Group. Maltese traders should avoid any entity using that name.
What should I do if I lose access to my account?
Contact XM support immediately and document all attempts. If unresolved, escalate to the relevant regulator, such as the Belize FSC for offshore accounts. Keep records and consider legal advice for recovery.
Quick Facts
Risk score1.8/5
Active regulator complaintYes
Top-tier regulatorCySEC
File last reviewedSeptember 2026
Risk warning: Trading CFDs involves significant risk of loss. This file does not constitute financial advice.
Compare cleaner-record brokers
See our top-rated brokers for Malta traders.
Compare Now
This risk file reflects publicly available complaint data, an active regulator complaint reference, and our own testing as of the date shown above, and can change. It is not financial advice and is not a determination that any law has been broken. Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss. comparebroker.io may earn a commission from featured alternative brokers.
Investing.comForbesFX StreetNASDAQ