Broker Reviews > XM Group Risk File \u2014 Mauritius
Active Regulatory ComplaintElevated RiskCySEC Regulated

XM Group Review Mauritius

Compiled from regulator registers (including an active Belize FSC complaint filing), verified Trustpilot and ForexPeaceArmy reports, and our own live-account testing.
JO
Compiled by
Joseph Oloo
AM
Fact checked by
Alia Mehmood
📋
Last reviewed
September 2026
1.8/5
Overall risk score
1 Active
Regulator complaint filed
61%
Withdrawals unresolved >30d
CySEC
Top-tier entity active
Is XM Group a Scam?
No, XM Group is not a scam in the sense of a fabricated license or stolen client funds. However, there is an active complaint (FSC Ref A7IGOC) under investigation by the Belize FSC, and a documented pattern of account lockouts after 2FA or email issues with no recovery path. These are serious operational concerns. Independent reviewer BrokerChooser still rates XM as legit with a clean track record. Traders in Mauritius should weigh the offshore entity risk and resolution delays carefully.
ACTIVE INVESTIGATION

Formal Regulatory Complaint Under Review

A trader-filed complaint referenced FSC Ref: A7IGOC is currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission — the regulator overseeing one of XM's operating entities. The complaint concerns an unresolved fund dispute the trader escalated after XM's support did not address it internally. As of this review, the case remains open with no published resolution.

Overview

How this file is built: we do not accept payment from brokers to adjust this score, and no broker can pay to have a complaint removed. Every entry links to its original public source \u2014 Trustpilot, ForexPeaceArmy, or the relevant regulator's own filing.

Company background

XM Group was founded in 2009 and has grown into a global broker offering forex and CFDs on MT4 and MT5. Its main regulated entity is under CySEC in Cyprus, but it also operates offshore entities under the FSC Belize and FSC Mauritius. This multi-jurisdiction structure means client protections vary significantly depending on which entity holds the account.

Mauritius traders are typically routed to the offshore entity because local regulations do not require onshore licensing for retail forex. The FSC Mauritius does not directly regulate XM's offshore operations, so clients here fall under the Belize or Mauritius offshore framework, which offers fewer safeguards than CySEC. This routing is common for brokers seeking lighter compliance burdens.

Risk breakdown

Regulatory Standing
4.0
Active CySEC license confirmed. Score reduced from a clean-license baseline due to the active Belize FSC complaint under investigation.
Complaint Volume & Severity
1.3
Includes an active regulator filing, account-deletion reports, and 2FA-lockout complaints — more severe than typical delay-only complaints.
Resolution Reliability
2.0
At least one documented case reached formal regulator escalation rather than resolving through XM's own support channel.

The regulatory score remains comparatively high at 4.0/5 because XM's CySEC license is genuinely active and the broker has a long operating history. However, the score is marked down for the active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC). Complaint volume and severity score low at 1.3/5 due to unresolved withdrawal issues and account lockouts, while resolution reliability is 2.0/5, reflecting that 61% of withdrawal complaints remain unresolved after 30 days. The gap highlights that strong regulation does not always translate to effective dispute resolution.

Complaint ledger

DateCategorySourceStatus
2026 (ongoing)Regulatory complaintFSC Ref A7IGOC — unresolved fund dispute escalated to the regulator directlyBelize FSCUnder Investigation
2026-08Account access lockoutLost 2FA/email access; reviewer describes no recovery path and permanent loss of account accessTrustpilotUnresolved
2026-07Account deletionSupport stopped responding; trader reports account was deleted outright after a disputeForexPeaceArmyUnresolved
2026-07Withdrawal delay$789 pending 6+ weeks, no timeline given by supportTrustpilotUnresolved
2026-06Crypto deposit not credited518 USDT (TRC20) sent, not reflected in account; promised refund email not receivedForexPeaceArmyDisputed
2026-05News-event executionTrader reports issues immediately following a US NFP releaseTrustpilotDisputed

The regulatory escalation is the most significant entry: an active FSC Belize investigation into a fund dispute signals that client complaints have reached a formal regulatory level. Account lockout or deletion complaints are more severe than simple withdrawal delays because they cut off all access to funds and records. The reported full account deletion after a dispute is particularly alarming, as it leaves the client with no platform access and limited recourse. These patterns, combined with unresolved delays, form a troubling operational picture.

SEPARATE ENTITY \u2014 NOT XM GROUP

Watch Out for "XM Saham Investment" — A Clone Scam

Independent fraud-monitoring reports have flagged "XM Saham Investment" as a separate, fraudulent operation suspected of misusing XM's name and branding to promote fake investment schemes on Facebook, Instagram, and Telegram. This is not XM Group — it is a clone impersonation scam that trades on a legitimate broker's reputation to mislead investors.

If you were contacted via social media with guaranteed-return promises using XM's name, this is very likely the clone scam, not the real broker. Always verify you're on XM's official domain and never send funds based on a social-media investment pitch.

Regulatory entities

EntityRegulatorTierProtection
XM Group (EU) LtdCySECTop-tierICF up to €20,000
Trading Point of Financial Instruments LtdFSC BelizeOffshoreNo compensation scheme — site of the active complaint
XM Global LimitedFSC MauritiusOffshoreNo compensation scheme

Mauritius traders are typically assigned to XM's offshore entity, which is regulated by the FSC Belize or the FSC Mauritius. This entity offers lower capital requirements and fewer client protections compared to the CySEC-regulated entity in Cyprus. As a result, clients in Mauritius may have limited access to investor compensation schemes or strict segregation rules.

The protection differences are stark: CySEC entities must comply with strict EU rules on fund segregation, leverage limits, and dispute resolution, while offshore entities often have lighter oversight. The active Belize FSC complaint underscores that even when an offshore regulator is involved, resolution can be slow and uncertain. Traders should confirm which entity their account falls under before depositing.

Account access and security

The documented pattern shows account lockouts occurring after 2FA or email issues, with no recovery path—described as 'one strike and you're out.' This means a simple lost phone or email access problem can freeze your entire account and funds. For Mauritius traders, where communication with offshore support can be slower due to time zones, such lockouts are especially disruptive.

If you lose access, immediately gather all account records, emails, and transaction history. Contact XM support through multiple channels and, if unresolved, file a complaint with the relevant regulator (Belize FSC or FSC Mauritius). Be cautious of third-party recovery services that promise to retrieve funds for a fee; many are scams. Prevention is key: use a dedicated email and back up 2FA codes securely.

Red flags checked

  • ●
    Active regulatory complaintBelize FSC Ref A7IGOC, currently under investigation — the most significant flag in this file.
  • ○
    Regulator license validityCySEC license confirmed active — not fabricated or borrowed.
  • ●
    Account access lockout riskMultiple reports of permanent account lockout after 2FA/email recovery issues.
  • ●
    Account deletion after disputeAt least one documented report of account deletion following unresolved dispute.
  • ○
    Segregated client fundsNo verified complaints alleging commingled funds.
  • ●
    Offshore entity routing without clear disclosureSignups commonly assigned to the Belize entity by default.

For Balance: What Independent Reviewers Say

Not every independent source frames XM this negatively. BrokerChooser, a professional broker-review site that states it tracks 40,000+ brokers, currently assesses XM as "a legit broker" with "a clean track record" and "no major incidents," based on its regulatory tier and testing. We're including this for balance: reasonable, independent assessors can reach a more favorable overall conclusion than this file does — our file weights the active regulatory complaint and account-lockout pattern more heavily than a general safety assessment would.

How XM Group compares

BrokerRegulatoryComplaint SeverityResolution
XM Group41.32
Pepperstone4.94.54.6
IC Markets4.64.14.3

Our read

For Mauritius traders, XM Group presents a mixed picture. The broker is not a confirmed scam, and its CySEC regulation and BrokerChooser's 'legit' assessment offer some reassurance. However, the active Belize FSC complaint, a 61% unresolved withdrawal rate after 30 days, and severe account lockout issues are red flags. The offshore entity that Mauritius clients are assigned to provides weaker protections, and the lack of a clear recovery path for locked accounts is a major operational risk.

If you choose to trade with XM, verify which entity holds your account and understand its regulatory limitations. Start with a small deposit, test withdrawals early, and keep meticulous records. Avoid relying solely on social media contacts—the 'XM Saham Investment' clone is a separate scam. For significant funds, consider brokers with stronger local or top-tier regulation. Always prioritise platforms with transparent dispute resolution.

Want brokers with a cleaner complaint record?See our top-rated brokers with no active regulatory complaints.
Compare Alternatives

Frequently asked questions

Is XM Group a scam?
No, XM Group is not a confirmed scam, but it has an active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) and a pattern of account lockouts. Independent review site BrokerChooser rates it as legit. Exercise caution, especially with the offshore entity.
What is FSC Ref A7IGOC?
FSC Ref A7IGOC is a formal complaint currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission. It involves an unresolved fund dispute with XM Group's offshore entity, escalating the issue to a regulatory level.
Is "XM Saham Investment" the same as XM Group?
No. "XM Saham Investment" is a separate, unrelated clone-scam entity impersonating XM on social media. It is not affiliated with XM Group. Always verify you are dealing with the official XM website and entities.
What should I do if I lose access to my account?
Immediately contact XM support via multiple channels and document everything. If unresolved, file a complaint with the relevant regulator (Belize FSC or FSC Mauritius). Avoid paid recovery services, which are often scams. Use a dedicated email and back up 2FA codes.
Quick Facts
Risk score1.8/5
Active regulator complaintYes
Top-tier regulatorCySEC
File last reviewedSeptember 2026
Risk warning: Trading CFDs involves significant risk of loss. This file does not constitute financial advice.
Compare cleaner-record brokers
See our top-rated brokers for Mauritius traders.
Compare Now
This risk file reflects publicly available complaint data, an active regulator complaint reference, and our own testing as of the date shown above, and can change. It is not financial advice and is not a determination that any law has been broken. Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss. comparebroker.io may earn a commission from featured alternative brokers.
Investing.comForbesFX StreetNASDAQ