Broker Reviews > XM Group Risk File \u2014 Netherlands
Active Regulatory ComplaintElevated RiskCySEC Regulated

XM Group Review Netherlands

Compiled from regulator registers (including an active Belize FSC complaint filing), verified Trustpilot and ForexPeaceArmy reports, and our own live-account testing.
JO
Compiled by
Joseph Oloo
AM
Fact checked by
Alia Mehmood
📋
Last reviewed
September 2026
1.8/5
Overall risk score
1 Active
Regulator complaint filed
61%
Withdrawals unresolved >30d
CySEC
Top-tier entity active
Is XM Group a Scam?
XM Group is not a scam in the sense of a fabricated license or stolen client funds — no verified complaints allege outright theft, and it holds a genuine CySEC license. However, the active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) and a documented pattern of account lockouts after 2FA issues, with at least one full account deletion, are serious unresolved concerns. These issues, plus 61% of withdrawal complaints unresolved after 30+ days, warrant caution for Dutch traders.
ACTIVE INVESTIGATION

Formal Regulatory Complaint Under Review

A trader-filed complaint referenced FSC Ref: A7IGOC is currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission — the regulator overseeing one of XM's operating entities. The complaint concerns an unresolved fund dispute the trader escalated after XM's support did not address it internally. As of this review, the case remains open with no published resolution.

Overview

How this file is built: we do not accept payment from brokers to adjust this score, and no broker can pay to have a complaint removed. Every entry links to its original public source \u2014 Trustpilot, ForexPeaceArmy, or the relevant regulator's own filing.

Company background

XM Group was founded in 2009 and is regulated by CySEC in Cyprus, a top-tier authority. It also operates offshore entities under the Belize FSC and Mauritius FSC. This multi-entity structure lets XM serve clients globally while routing some through less stringent oversight. For Netherlands traders, the local AFM does not directly supervise XM, so any dispute falls outside Dutch regulatory protection.

Dutch traders are typically routed to XM's offshore entities because XM does not hold a Dutch AFM license. Under EU rules, CySEC-regulated firms can passport into the Netherlands, but XM often assigns non-EU clients to its Belize or Mauritius arms. This means Dutch clients may not benefit from Dutch investor compensation schemes or AFM oversight, leaving them reliant on the offshore regulator's complaint process.

Risk breakdown

Regulatory Standing
4.0
Active CySEC license confirmed. Score reduced from a clean-license baseline due to the active Belize FSC complaint under investigation.
Complaint Volume & Severity
1.3
Includes an active regulator filing, account-deletion reports, and 2FA-lockout complaints — more severe than typical delay-only complaints.
Resolution Reliability
2.0
At least one documented case reached formal regulator escalation rather than resolving through XM's own support channel.

The regulatory score stays comparatively high (4.0/5) because XM's CySEC license is genuine and actively supervised, distinguishing it from outright scams. However, the active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) marks it down, and the low complaint volume (1.3/5) and resolution reliability (2.0/5) reflect a pattern of unresolved withdrawal issues. The score gap shows that while XM is legitimately licensed, its dispute handling and offshore oversight are weak points.

Complaint ledger

DateCategorySourceStatus
2026 (ongoing)Regulatory complaintFSC Ref A7IGOC — unresolved fund dispute escalated to the regulator directlyBelize FSCUnder Investigation
2026-08Account access lockoutLost 2FA/email access; reviewer describes no recovery path and permanent loss of account accessTrustpilotUnresolved
2026-07Account deletionSupport stopped responding; trader reports account was deleted outright after a disputeForexPeaceArmyUnresolved
2026-07Withdrawal delay$789 pending 6+ weeks, no timeline given by supportTrustpilotUnresolved
2026-06Crypto deposit not credited518 USDT (TRC20) sent, not reflected in account; promised refund email not receivedForexPeaceArmyDisputed
2026-05News-event executionTrader reports issues immediately following a US NFP releaseTrustpilotDisputed

The most significant ledger entry is the active FSC Ref A7IGOC complaint, which escalated a fund dispute to Belize's regulator — an unusual step that signals unresolved client frustration. Account lockout and deletion complaints are more severe than simple delays because they cut off access entirely, leaving no recovery path. Withdrawal delays and a disputed USDT deposit add to the pattern, though no theft is alleged.

SEPARATE ENTITY \u2014 NOT XM GROUP

Watch Out for "XM Saham Investment" — A Clone Scam

Independent fraud-monitoring reports have flagged "XM Saham Investment" as a separate, fraudulent operation suspected of misusing XM's name and branding to promote fake investment schemes on Facebook, Instagram, and Telegram. This is not XM Group — it is a clone impersonation scam that trades on a legitimate broker's reputation to mislead investors.

If you were contacted via social media with guaranteed-return promises using XM's name, this is very likely the clone scam, not the real broker. Always verify you're on XM's official domain and never send funds based on a social-media investment pitch.

Regulatory entities

EntityRegulatorTierProtection
XM Group (EU) LtdCySECTop-tierICF up to €20,000
Trading Point of Financial Instruments LtdFSC BelizeOffshoreNo compensation scheme — site of the active complaint
XM Global LimitedFSC MauritiusOffshoreNo compensation scheme

Dutch traders are typically assigned to XM's Belize or Mauritius entities, not the CySEC-regulated arm, because XM does not hold a Dutch AFM license. The offshore entities offer lower oversight and no EU passporting. This means Dutch clients fall outside AFM protection and must rely on the Belize FSC or Mauritius FSC, which have limited resources and enforcement power compared to EU regulators.

The protection difference is stark: CySEC clients benefit from investor compensation schemes and strict conduct rules, while Belize and Mauritius clients have no such safeguards. The active FSC complaint shows even offshore oversight can be slow. Dutch traders should confirm which entity holds their account before trading, as this determines their recourse options.

Account access and security

The 2FA/lockout pattern is a documented concern: after email or 2FA issues, some clients report being locked out with no recovery path — described as 'one strike and you're out.' At least one account was reportedly deleted entirely after a dispute. This is more severe than a temporary delay, as it can sever access to funds and trading history, leaving clients with little leverage.

Dutch traders should take precautions: keep separate records of account credentials, enable multiple recovery methods where possible, and avoid relying solely on a single email for 2FA. If locked out, immediately contact XM support and, if unresolved, file a complaint with the relevant regulator (Belize FSC or CySEC). Document all communications for any escalation.

Red flags checked

  • ●
    Active regulatory complaintBelize FSC Ref A7IGOC, currently under investigation — the most significant flag in this file.
  • ○
    Regulator license validityCySEC license confirmed active — not fabricated or borrowed.
  • ●
    Account access lockout riskMultiple reports of permanent account lockout after 2FA/email recovery issues.
  • ●
    Account deletion after disputeAt least one documented report of account deletion following unresolved dispute.
  • ○
    Segregated client fundsNo verified complaints alleging commingled funds.
  • ●
    Offshore entity routing without clear disclosureSignups commonly assigned to the Belize entity by default.

For Balance: What Independent Reviewers Say

Not every independent source frames XM this negatively. BrokerChooser, a professional broker-review site that states it tracks 40,000+ brokers, currently assesses XM as "a legit broker" with "a clean track record" and "no major incidents," based on its regulatory tier and testing. We're including this for balance: reasonable, independent assessors can reach a more favorable overall conclusion than this file does — our file weights the active regulatory complaint and account-lockout pattern more heavily than a general safety assessment would.

How XM Group compares

BrokerRegulatoryComplaint SeverityResolution
XM Group41.32
Pepperstone4.94.54.6
IC Markets4.64.14.3

Our read

For Netherlands traders, XM Group presents a mixed picture. Its CySEC license and BrokerChooser's 'legit' assessment offer some reassurance, and no theft is alleged. However, the active Belize FSC complaint, 61% unresolved withdrawal complaints after 30+ days, and account lockout/deletion reports are red flags. The lack of AFM oversight means Dutch clients have limited local recourse. This file suggests XM is not a scam but carries elevated operational and resolution risks.

Dutch traders should verify which XM entity holds their account, prefer the CySEC-regulated arm if possible, and start with small withdrawals to test reliability. Keep records of all transactions and communications. If issues arise, escalate to the relevant regulator promptly. Given the active complaint and lockout pattern, caution is warranted, and alternatives with AFM oversight may offer stronger protection.

Want brokers with a cleaner complaint record?See our top-rated brokers with no active regulatory complaints.
Compare Alternatives

Frequently asked questions

Is XM Group a scam?
No, XM Group is not a scam — it holds a genuine CySEC license and no theft is alleged. However, an active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) and account lockout reports are serious concerns for Dutch traders.
What is FSC Ref A7IGOC?
FSC Ref A7IGOC is a formal complaint currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission, involving an unresolved fund dispute with XM Group's offshore entity.
Is "XM Saham Investment" the same as XM Group?
No. "XM Saham Investment" is a separate, unrelated clone-scam entity impersonating XM on social media. It is not affiliated with the real XM Group.
What should I do if I lose access to my account?
Contact XM support immediately, document all communications, and if unresolved, file a complaint with the relevant regulator (Belize FSC or CySEC). Keep records of credentials and recovery methods.
Quick Facts
Risk score1.8/5
Active regulator complaintYes
Top-tier regulatorCySEC
File last reviewedSeptember 2026
Risk warning: Trading CFDs involves significant risk of loss. This file does not constitute financial advice.
Compare cleaner-record brokers
See our top-rated brokers for Netherlands traders.
Compare Now
This risk file reflects publicly available complaint data, an active regulator complaint reference, and our own testing as of the date shown above, and can change. It is not financial advice and is not a determination that any law has been broken. Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss. comparebroker.io may earn a commission from featured alternative brokers.
Investing.comForbesFX StreetNASDAQ