Featured On
A trader-filed complaint referenced FSC Ref: A7IGOC is currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission — the regulator overseeing one of XM's operating entities. The complaint concerns an unresolved fund dispute the trader escalated after XM's support did not address it internally. As of this review, the case remains open with no published resolution.
XM Group, founded in 2009, is a well-known forex and CFD broker regulated by CySEC in Cyprus. It also operates offshore entities under the Belize FSC and Mauritius FSC. While its EU entity is top-tier regulated, clients from many non-EU countries, including New Zealand, are often routed to these offshore branches. This structure allows XM to serve a global client base, but it also means that protections vary significantly depending on which entity holds the account.
New Zealand traders are typically assigned to XM’s offshore entity because XM does not hold a local FMA licence. The FMA regulates domestic brokers, but offshore brokers can accept NZ clients without local oversight. As a result, NZ traders fall under Belize or Mauritius regulations, which offer weaker safeguards than the FMA or CySEC. This is a common setup for international brokers, but it means NZ clients must rely on the offshore regulator’s complaint process if disputes arise.
XM’s regulatory score remains comparatively high (4.0/5) because its CySEC licence is genuinely active and enforced, giving it a solid baseline. However, the score is marked down by the active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC), which signals an unresolved dispute. Complaint volume and severity (1.3/5) and resolution reliability (2.0/5) are low due to patterns of lockouts, withdrawal delays, and unresolved cases. The high regulatory score reflects the strength of its primary regulator, but the low complaint scores show that real-world outcomes for clients can be problematic.
The most significant entry in the ledger is the active regulatory escalation: the Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) is currently under investigation, indicating a formal dispute that has not been resolved. This is more serious than routine delays because it involves a regulator’s involvement. Account lockout and deletion complaints are also severe—they cut off access to funds entirely, unlike delay-only issues. These entries, combined with a 61% unresolved withdrawal complaint rate after 30+ days, paint a concerning picture of post-dispute client treatment.
Independent fraud-monitoring reports have flagged "XM Saham Investment" as a separate, fraudulent operation suspected of misusing XM's name and branding to promote fake investment schemes on Facebook, Instagram, and Telegram. This is not XM Group — it is a clone impersonation scam that trades on a legitimate broker's reputation to mislead investors.
If you were contacted via social media with guaranteed-return promises using XM's name, this is very likely the clone scam, not the real broker. Always verify you're on XM's official domain and never send funds based on a social-media investment pitch.
| Entity | Regulator | Tier | Protection |
|---|---|---|---|
| XM Group (EU) Ltd | CySEC | Top-tier | ICF up to €20,000 |
| Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd | FSC Belize | Offshore | No compensation scheme — site of the active complaint |
| XM Global Limited | FSC Mauritius | Offshore | No compensation scheme |
New Zealand traders are typically assigned to XM’s offshore entity, likely under the Belize FSC or Mauritius FSC, because XM does not have a New Zealand FMA licence. This means NZ clients are not covered by CySEC’s stricter European regulations. Instead, they fall under the offshore entity’s rules, which may offer less stringent oversight and different complaint procedures. It is crucial for NZ traders to confirm which entity their account is with before depositing funds.
The protection differences are substantial. CySEC-regulated accounts benefit from investor compensation schemes and tighter capital requirements, while Belize and Mauritius entities do not offer the same level of safeguards. For NZ traders, this means that if a dispute arises, recourse may be limited to the offshore regulator’s process, which can be slower and less transparent. Understanding these differences helps set realistic expectations about fund security and dispute resolution.
The documented pattern of account lockouts after 2FA or email issues—described as “one strike and you’re out”—is a serious concern. Once locked out, clients reportedly have no clear recovery path, and in at least one case, an account was deleted after a dispute. This suggests that XM’s account security protocols, while intended to protect clients, can become a barrier to accessing funds. For NZ traders, who may be in a different time zone and rely on email support, such lockouts can be particularly frustrating and difficult to resolve.
Traders should take precautions to avoid falling into this trap. Use a dedicated email address for your trading account and enable 2FA with a reliable authenticator app, not just SMS. Keep copies of all communication with XM, including chat logs and emails. If you lose access, immediately contact XM through multiple channels and, if unresolved, file a complaint with the relevant regulator (e.g., Belize FSC). Being proactive and documenting everything can improve your chances of recovery.
Not every independent source frames XM this negatively. BrokerChooser, a professional broker-review site that states it tracks 40,000+ brokers, currently assesses XM as "a legit broker" with "a clean track record" and "no major incidents," based on its regulatory tier and testing. We're including this for balance: reasonable, independent assessors can reach a more favorable overall conclusion than this file does — our file weights the active regulatory complaint and account-lockout pattern more heavily than a general safety assessment would.
| Broker | Regulatory | Complaint Severity | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| XM Group | 4 | 1.3 | 2 |
| Pepperstone | 4.9 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| IC Markets | 4.6 | 4.1 | 4.3 |
For New Zealand traders, XM Group presents a mixed picture. On one hand, it is a long-established broker with CySEC regulation and a “legit” assessment from BrokerChooser. On the other hand, the active Belize FSC complaint, account lockout pattern, and low resolution reliability scores are red flags. While no outright fraud is confirmed, the risk of accessing your funds being hindered by administrative issues is real. NZ traders should weigh these factors carefully, especially since they are likely assigned to an offshore entity with weaker protections.
Practically, if you choose to trade with XM, verify which entity your account falls under and understand its complaint process. Start with a small deposit to test withdrawal reliability. Avoid keeping large balances on the platform. Use secure, unique credentials and keep records of all transactions. If you encounter lockouts or delays, escalate promptly to the offshore regulator and consider seeking local legal advice. For those who prioritize strong local regulation, NZ-based brokers under the FMA may offer greater peace of mind.