Featured On
A trader-filed complaint referenced FSC Ref: A7IGOC is currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission — the regulator overseeing one of XM's operating entities. The complaint concerns an unresolved fund dispute the trader escalated after XM's support did not address it internally. As of this review, the case remains open with no published resolution.
XM Group was founded in 2009 and has grown into a global forex and CFD broker. It is primarily regulated by CySEC in Cyprus, a top-tier authority, but also operates offshore entities under the FSC Belize and FSC Mauritius. These offshore branches often serve clients outside the European Economic Area, including North Macedonia. While CySEC oversight provides strong investor protection, the offshore entities operate under lighter regulatory regimes, which can affect complaint resolution and fund safety.
Traders in North Macedonia are typically routed to XM's offshore entity, likely under FSC Belize or FSC Mauritius, because the country is not part of the EEA. This means they do not benefit from CySEC's strict rules, such as negative balance protection or compensation schemes. The local regulator, SEC Macedonia, does not oversee XM, leaving clients with limited recourse if disputes arise. This offshore routing is common for brokers serving smaller markets, but it shifts the regulatory burden to less stringent authorities.
XM's regulatory score remains comparatively high at 4.0/5 because its CySEC license is genuinely active and enforced, reflecting a solid compliance framework. However, the score is marked down due to an active complaint (FSC Ref A7IGOC) under investigation by the Belize FSC. In contrast, complaint volume and severity score just 1.3/5, and resolution reliability is 2.0/5, reflecting unresolved withdrawal issues and account lockouts. This disparity shows that while regulation is strong on paper, practical dispute resolution for offshore clients lags, pulling down the overall risk score to 1.8/5.
The most significant entry in the complaint ledger is the active regulatory escalation, FSC Ref A7IGOC, currently under investigation by the Belize FSC. This unresolved fund dispute signals a failure to settle internally, drawing official scrutiny. Account lockout and deletion complaints are more severe than simple withdrawal delays because they cut off access entirely, leaving clients with no recovery path. While withdrawal delays are frustrating, lockouts and deletions represent a fundamental breakdown in the broker-client relationship, often requiring regulatory intervention to resolve.
Independent fraud-monitoring reports have flagged "XM Saham Investment" as a separate, fraudulent operation suspected of misusing XM's name and branding to promote fake investment schemes on Facebook, Instagram, and Telegram. This is not XM Group — it is a clone impersonation scam that trades on a legitimate broker's reputation to mislead investors.
If you were contacted via social media with guaranteed-return promises using XM's name, this is very likely the clone scam, not the real broker. Always verify you're on XM's official domain and never send funds based on a social-media investment pitch.
| Entity | Regulator | Tier | Protection |
|---|---|---|---|
| XM Group (EU) Ltd | CySEC | Top-tier | ICF up to €20,000 |
| Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd | FSC Belize | Offshore | No compensation scheme — site of the active complaint |
| XM Global Limited | FSC Mauritius | Offshore | No compensation scheme |
North Macedonian traders are typically assigned to XM's offshore entity, most likely under the FSC Belize or FSC Mauritius, because North Macedonia is not an EEA member. These entities offer lower regulatory oversight compared to CySEC. While they allow XM to serve clients in regions without an EU passport, the trade-off is reduced investor protection. The specific entity may vary based on onboarding, but the pattern is consistent: non-EEA clients are steered away from the CySEC-regulated arm.
The protection differences are stark. CySEC-regulated clients benefit from negative balance protection, segregation of client funds, and access to the Investor Compensation Fund up to €20,000. Offshore clients under FSC Belize or Mauritius do not have these safeguards. Dispute resolution is also weaker, as offshore regulators often lack the resources or mandate to pursue complaints aggressively. For North Macedonian traders, this means relying on the broker's own resolution process, which has shown reliability issues.
The documented account-access lockout pattern is a serious concern. Traders have reported being locked out after 2FA or email issues, with no recovery path—described as 'one strike and you're out.' This leaves clients unable to access funds or manage positions, effectively freezing their assets. At least one case involved a full account deletion after a dispute. Such practices are not typical of top-tier brokers and suggest gaps in customer support and account security protocols, particularly for offshore clients.
North Macedonian traders should take precautions: enable all available security features, keep copies of communication with support, and document account activity regularly. If locked out, immediately contact XM support and, if unresolved, escalate to the relevant regulator (FSC Belize or FSC Mauritius). However, recovery options are limited. Avoid relying solely on email for 2FA; use an authenticator app if possible. Consider diversifying brokers to reduce exposure to a single platform's access risks.
Not every independent source frames XM this negatively. BrokerChooser, a professional broker-review site that states it tracks 40,000+ brokers, currently assesses XM as "a legit broker" with "a clean track record" and "no major incidents," based on its regulatory tier and testing. We're including this for balance: reasonable, independent assessors can reach a more favorable overall conclusion than this file does — our file weights the active regulatory complaint and account-lockout pattern more heavily than a general safety assessment would.
| Broker | Regulatory | Complaint Severity | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| XM Group | 4 | 1.3 | 2 |
| Pepperstone | 4.9 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| IC Markets | 4.6 | 4.1 | 4.3 |
For North Macedonian traders, XM Group presents a mixed picture. Its CySEC regulation and BrokerChooser's 'legit' assessment offer some reassurance, but the active Belize FSC complaint (FSC Ref A7IGOC), account lockout pattern, and unresolved withdrawal complaints (61% after 30+ days) are red flags. The offshore entity serving North Macedonia lacks strong local oversight from SEC Macedonia, leaving clients with limited recourse. While no outright fraud is confirmed, the resolution reliability score of 2.0/5 suggests disputes can be difficult to resolve. Traders should proceed with caution.
Practical recommendations: if you trade with XM, use the CySEC-regulated entity if eligible, though North Macedonians are typically routed offshore. Keep detailed records of all transactions and communications. Test withdrawals with small amounts first. Be wary of social media impostors like 'XM Saham Investment'—they are unrelated clone scams. Consider brokers with stronger local or EU regulation. Always prioritize platforms with robust dispute resolution and transparent complaint histories.