Broker Reviews > XM Group Risk File \u2014 Senegal
Active Regulatory ComplaintElevated RiskCySEC Regulated

XM Group Review Senegal

Compiled from regulator registers (including an active Belize FSC complaint filing), verified Trustpilot and ForexPeaceArmy reports, and our own live-account testing.
JO
Compiled by
Joseph Oloo
AM
Fact checked by
Alia Mehmood
📋
Last reviewed
September 2026
1.8/5
Overall risk score
1 Active
Regulator complaint filed
61%
Withdrawals unresolved >30d
CySEC
Top-tier entity active
Is XM Group a Scam?
No, XM Group is not a confirmed scam. It has operated since 2009 under genuine CySEC regulation, and independent reviewer BrokerChooser calls it "legit" with a "clean track record." However, for Senegal-based traders routed to its offshore FSC Belize entity, serious concerns exist: an active FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) is under investigation, and there is a documented pattern of account lockouts after 2FA/email issues with no recovery path. No fraud is confirmed, but these unresolved issues warrant caution.
ACTIVE INVESTIGATION

Formal Regulatory Complaint Under Review

A trader-filed complaint referenced FSC Ref: A7IGOC is currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission — the regulator overseeing one of XM's operating entities. The complaint concerns an unresolved fund dispute the trader escalated after XM's support did not address it internally. As of this review, the case remains open with no published resolution.

Overview

How this file is built: we do not accept payment from brokers to adjust this score, and no broker can pay to have a complaint removed. Every entry links to its original public source \u2014 Trustpilot, ForexPeaceArmy, or the relevant regulator's own filing.

Company background

XM Group was founded in 2009 and has grown into a global broker offering forex and CFDs on MT4 and MT5. Its main regulated entity is licensed by CySEC in Cyprus, a top-tier authority. For many international clients, including those in Senegal, XM routes accounts to offshore entities regulated by the FSC in Belize or the FSC in Mauritius, which offer lighter oversight and fewer protections than CySEC.

Senegal's own financial regulator, CREPMF, oversees the regional WAEMU capital markets but does not license or supervise retail forex brokers like XM. Senegalese traders therefore have no local recourse; they must rely on the offshore regulator where their account is held. This regulatory gap is why most West African clients end up with the Belize or Mauritius entity rather than the CySEC one.

Risk breakdown

Regulatory Standing
4.0
Active CySEC license confirmed. Score reduced from a clean-license baseline due to the active Belize FSC complaint under investigation.
Complaint Volume & Severity
1.3
Includes an active regulator filing, account-deletion reports, and 2FA-lockout complaints — more severe than typical delay-only complaints.
Resolution Reliability
2.0
At least one documented case reached formal regulator escalation rather than resolving through XM's own support channel.

The regulatory score remains comparatively high at 4.0/5 because XM's CySEC license is genuine and actively supervised, and independent reviews like BrokerChooser still describe the broker as legitimate. However, the complaint and resolution scores are low because a formal complaint (FSC Ref A7IGOC) is currently under active investigation by the Belize FSC, and 61% of withdrawal complaints remain unresolved after 30+ days. This unresolved dispute, combined with documented account-access issues, drags down the overall risk profile despite the strong regulatory base.

Complaint ledger

DateCategorySourceStatus
2026 (ongoing)Regulatory complaintFSC Ref A7IGOC — unresolved fund dispute escalated to the regulator directlyBelize FSCUnder Investigation
2026-08Account access lockoutLost 2FA/email access; reviewer describes no recovery path and permanent loss of account accessTrustpilotUnresolved
2026-07Account deletionSupport stopped responding; trader reports account was deleted outright after a disputeForexPeaceArmyUnresolved
2026-07Withdrawal delay$789 pending 6+ weeks, no timeline given by supportTrustpilotUnresolved
2026-06Crypto deposit not credited518 USDT (TRC20) sent, not reflected in account; promised refund email not receivedForexPeaceArmyDisputed
2026-05News-event executionTrader reports issues immediately following a US NFP releaseTrustpilotDisputed

The most significant entry is the active FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC), which represents a formal escalation to the Belize regulator and remains unresolved. Beyond that, the account lockout and full account deletion reports are more severe than simple withdrawal delays, because they can sever a trader's access to funds entirely. Withdrawal delays and a disputed USDT deposit add to the pattern, but the lockout and deletion cases signal a deeper operational risk for affected clients.

SEPARATE ENTITY \u2014 NOT XM GROUP

Watch Out for "XM Saham Investment" — A Clone Scam

Independent fraud-monitoring reports have flagged "XM Saham Investment" as a separate, fraudulent operation suspected of misusing XM's name and branding to promote fake investment schemes on Facebook, Instagram, and Telegram. This is not XM Group — it is a clone impersonation scam that trades on a legitimate broker's reputation to mislead investors.

If you were contacted via social media with guaranteed-return promises using XM's name, this is very likely the clone scam, not the real broker. Always verify you're on XM's official domain and never send funds based on a social-media investment pitch.

Regulatory entities

EntityRegulatorTierProtection
XM Group (EU) LtdCySECTop-tierICF up to €20,000
Trading Point of Financial Instruments LtdFSC BelizeOffshoreNo compensation scheme — site of the active complaint
XM Global LimitedFSC MauritiusOffshoreNo compensation scheme

Senegal-based traders are typically assigned to XM's offshore entity regulated by the FSC Belize, not the CySEC-regulated Cyprus entity. This is common for clients outside the EEA, as XM reserves its top-tier license for European clients. The Belize entity offers lower capital requirements and less stringent oversight, meaning Senegalese clients fall outside CySEC's direct protection and must seek recourse through the Belize FSC.

The protection differences are substantial. CySEC regulation includes investor compensation schemes and strict conduct rules, while the Belize FSC framework provides far weaker safeguards. If a dispute arises, a Senegalese trader dealing with the Belize entity cannot rely on European authorities. This makes the active FSC complaint particularly relevant, as it shows the limits of the offshore regulator's ability to resolve conflicts quickly.

Account access and security

The documented pattern of account lockouts after 2FA or email issues, described as "one strike and you're out," is a serious operational risk. At least one reported case involved full account deletion after a dispute. For Senegalese traders, who may rely on email or mobile authentication with limited backup options, such lockouts can be devastating, especially if support channels are slow or unresponsive.

Traders should take precautions: keep independent records of account activity, use a dedicated email with recovery options, and enable all available security features. If locked out, immediately contact XM support through multiple channels and, if unresolved, consider filing a complaint with the Belize FSC. Do not send additional funds while access is blocked, and be wary of third-party 'recovery' services that may be scams.

Red flags checked

  • ●
    Active regulatory complaintBelize FSC Ref A7IGOC, currently under investigation — the most significant flag in this file.
  • ○
    Regulator license validityCySEC license confirmed active — not fabricated or borrowed.
  • ●
    Account access lockout riskMultiple reports of permanent account lockout after 2FA/email recovery issues.
  • ●
    Account deletion after disputeAt least one documented report of account deletion following unresolved dispute.
  • ○
    Segregated client fundsNo verified complaints alleging commingled funds.
  • ●
    Offshore entity routing without clear disclosureSignups commonly assigned to the Belize entity by default.

For Balance: What Independent Reviewers Say

Not every independent source frames XM this negatively. BrokerChooser, a professional broker-review site that states it tracks 40,000+ brokers, currently assesses XM as "a legit broker" with "a clean track record" and "no major incidents," based on its regulatory tier and testing. We're including this for balance: reasonable, independent assessors can reach a more favorable overall conclusion than this file does — our file weights the active regulatory complaint and account-lockout pattern more heavily than a general safety assessment would.

How XM Group compares

BrokerRegulatoryComplaint SeverityResolution
XM Group41.32
Pepperstone4.94.54.6
IC Markets4.64.14.3

Our read

For Senegal-based traders, XM Group presents a mixed picture. The broker is not a confirmed scam, and its CySEC-regulated arm maintains a solid reputation. However, most Senegalese clients are assigned to the offshore Belize entity, where an active FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) is under investigation and 61% of withdrawal complaints remain unresolved after 30 days. The documented pattern of account lockouts and one account deletion adds significant concern. While no theft or fabricated license is alleged, the combination of offshore regulation and poor resolution reliability warrants caution.

Practical recommendations for Senegalese traders: verify which entity your account is assigned to before depositing, and understand that Belize FSC protection is weaker than CySEC's. Start with a small deposit to test withdrawal speed, keep thorough records, and avoid relying solely on 2FA-linked email. If you encounter lockouts or delays, escalate promptly to the Belize FSC and consider alternative brokers with stronger local or regional oversight. Be aware that CREPMF does not regulate forex brokers, so self-protection is essential.

Want brokers with a cleaner complaint record?See our top-rated brokers with no active regulatory complaints.
Compare Alternatives

Frequently asked questions

Is XM Group a scam?
No, XM Group is not a confirmed scam. It is regulated by CySEC and reviewed as legit by BrokerChooser. However, an active FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) is under investigation, and account lockout issues are documented, so caution is advised for offshore clients.
What is FSC Ref A7IGOC?
FSC Ref A7IGOC is a formal complaint currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission. It involves an unresolved fund dispute with XM's offshore entity and is a key factor in the broker's elevated risk profile.
Is "XM Saham Investment" the same as XM Group?
No. "XM Saham Investment" is a separate, unrelated clone-scam entity impersonating XM on social media. It is not affiliated with XM Group. Traders should avoid any platform using that name.
What should I do if I lose access to my account?
Contact XM support immediately through multiple channels and document all attempts. If unresolved, file a complaint with the Belize FSC. Avoid paying third-party recovery services, and keep independent records of your account and transactions.
Quick Facts
Risk score1.8/5
Active regulator complaintYes
Top-tier regulatorCySEC
File last reviewedSeptember 2026
Risk warning: Trading CFDs involves significant risk of loss. This file does not constitute financial advice.
Compare cleaner-record brokers
See our top-rated brokers for Senegal traders.
Compare Now
This risk file reflects publicly available complaint data, an active regulator complaint reference, and our own testing as of the date shown above, and can change. It is not financial advice and is not a determination that any law has been broken. Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss. comparebroker.io may earn a commission from featured alternative brokers.
Investing.comForbesFX StreetNASDAQ