Featured On
A trader-filed complaint referenced FSC Ref: A7IGOC is currently under active investigation by the Belize Financial Services Commission — the regulator overseeing one of XM's operating entities. The complaint concerns an unresolved fund dispute the trader escalated after XM's support did not address it internally. As of this review, the case remains open with no published resolution.
XM Group was founded in 2009 and has grown into a global broker offering forex and CFDs on MT4 and MT5. Its main regulated entity is licensed by CySEC in Cyprus, but it also operates offshore entities under the FSC in Belize and the FSC in Mauritius. This structure allows it to serve clients worldwide while maintaining a top-tier license in Europe.
Singapore traders are typically routed to XM's offshore entities because MAS does not license XM locally. MAS regulates capital markets and payment services in Singapore, but XM does not hold a MAS license, so Singapore clients fall under the offshore entity's jurisdiction. This is common for international brokers, but it means local dispute resolution is limited.
The regulatory score remains comparatively high at 4.0/5 because XM's CySEC license is genuinely active and respected, and independent reviews like BrokerChooser affirm its legitimacy. However, the score is marked down for the active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC), which signals an unresolved fund dispute. Complaint and resolution scores are low due to a pattern of withdrawal delays and account lockouts, with 61% of withdrawal complaints unresolved after 30+ days.
The regulatory escalation is the most significant entry: a formal complaint under active investigation by the Belize FSC. This unresolved dispute is more serious than routine delays because it involves a regulator's attention. Account lockout and deletion are also more severe than delay-only complaints, as they can leave traders with no access to funds and no clear recovery path.
Independent fraud-monitoring reports have flagged "XM Saham Investment" as a separate, fraudulent operation suspected of misusing XM's name and branding to promote fake investment schemes on Facebook, Instagram, and Telegram. This is not XM Group — it is a clone impersonation scam that trades on a legitimate broker's reputation to mislead investors.
If you were contacted via social media with guaranteed-return promises using XM's name, this is very likely the clone scam, not the real broker. Always verify you're on XM's official domain and never send funds based on a social-media investment pitch.
| Entity | Regulator | Tier | Protection |
|---|---|---|---|
| XM Group (EU) Ltd | CySEC | Top-tier | ICF up to €20,000 |
| Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd | FSC Belize | Offshore | No compensation scheme — site of the active complaint |
| XM Global Limited | FSC Mauritius | Offshore | No compensation scheme |
Singapore traders are typically assigned to XM's offshore entity, likely under the FSC Belize or FSC Mauritius, because XM does not have a MAS license. These entities offer less stringent regulatory oversight compared to CySEC, meaning fewer protections and slower dispute resolution for Singapore clients.
The protection differences are notable: CySEC-regulated clients benefit from investor compensation schemes and stricter compliance, while offshore entities may not offer such safeguards. For Singapore traders, this means relying on the offshore regulator's complaint process, which can be less responsive.
The 2FA/lockout pattern is a documented concern: after 2FA or email issues, accounts can be locked with no recovery path, described as 'one strike and you're out.' At least one case involved full account deletion after a dispute. This leaves traders unable to access funds or resolve issues through normal channels.
If you lose access, gather all evidence (emails, transaction records) and file a complaint with the relevant regulator (e.g., Belize FSC). Be cautious of recovery-option scams that promise to retrieve funds for a fee; instead, use official dispute mechanisms and consider legal advice if amounts are significant.
Not every independent source frames XM this negatively. BrokerChooser, a professional broker-review site that states it tracks 40,000+ brokers, currently assesses XM as "a legit broker" with "a clean track record" and "no major incidents," based on its regulatory tier and testing. We're including this for balance: reasonable, independent assessors can reach a more favorable overall conclusion than this file does — our file weights the active regulatory complaint and account-lockout pattern more heavily than a general safety assessment would.
| Broker | Regulatory | Complaint Severity | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| XM Group | 4 | 1.3 | 2 |
| Pepperstone | 4.9 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| IC Markets | 4.6 | 4.1 | 4.3 |
For Singapore traders, XM Group presents a mixed picture. It is not a scam, with a genuine CySEC license and positive independent reviews. However, the active Belize FSC complaint (Ref A7IGOC) and pattern of account lockouts and withdrawal delays are serious concerns. The offshore entity assignment means limited local recourse, and 61% of withdrawal complaints remain unresolved after 30 days. Traders should weigh these risks carefully.
Singapore traders should verify which entity they are contracting with, prefer CySEC-regulated accounts if possible, and test small withdrawals early. Keep records of all communications and be aware of the clone 'XM Saham Investment' on social media. If issues arise, escalate promptly to the relevant regulator and avoid paying upfront fees to recovery services.