HomeCompareFBS vs IC MarketsUzbekistan
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
Uzbekistan
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

FBS vs IC Markets 2026: Which Broker is Better for Uzbekistan Traders?

Which broker is better for Uzbekistan traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

FBS logo
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA · Founded 2009
Open Account
VS
IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA · Founded 2007
Open Account
Winner: FBS
Categories: 12 compared
For: Uzbekistan traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — Uzbekistan Traders

Best Overall
FBS
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
IC Markets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for Uzbekistan Muslims
Best for Beginners
FBS
Better education & support
$5 vs $200
Min deposit
1:3000 vs 1:5000
Max leverage
CySEC vs ASIC
Top regulator
3.7 vs 3.6
Our scores
Table of Contents

For Uzbekistan traders exploring the forex market, choosing the right broker is crucial for success. FBS and IC Markets are two prominent choices, each catering to different trader profiles. FBS, with a score of 3.7/5, is known for its user-friendly platform, generous bonuses, and strong focus on emerging markets, making it a popular choice for beginners in Uzbekistan. In contrast, IC Markets, rated 4.8/5, is a global powerhouse offering institutional-grade trading conditions, ultra-low spreads, and lightning-fast execution, appealing to experienced and high-volume traders. Both brokers accept Uzbekistan residents and support local deposit methods like Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20. However, neither is regulated by the local financial regulator of Uzbekistan, which is an important consideration. This comparison will help you decide which broker aligns with your trading style, budget, and goals in the Uzbek market.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

FBS
FBS
CySEC · IFSC · FSCA
3.7
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA
3.6
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.8
WIN
3.7
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.4
3.8
WIN
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.2
3.9
WIN
Deposits
Local payments
3.8
WIN
3.7
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.5
WIN
3.4
Education
Webinars, guides
3.8
WIN
3.3
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.8
WIN
3.7
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.7
WIN
3.6
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentFBSIC MarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotIC Markets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalIC Markets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsIC Markets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsIC Markets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$5$200IC Markets

When comparing trading costs for Uzbekistan traders, IC Markets clearly outperforms FBS. IC Markets offers spreads from 0.0 pips on its Raw Spread account with a commission of $7 per lot round-turn, while FBS standard accounts have spreads starting from 0.5 pips with no commission. For a trader executing 10 lots per month, IC Markets would cost approximately $70 in commissions plus variable spreads, whereas FBS would cost around $50 in spreads alone. However, for scalpers and day traders, IC Markets' tighter spreads can lead to significant savings, especially during volatile sessions. FBS also offers a Zero Spread account but with higher commissions. Overall, active Uzbekistan traders will find IC Markets more cost-effective.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeFBSIC Markets
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$5$200
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - Uzbekistan Traders

Entity / AssetFBSIC Markets
Uzbekistan (offshore)Up to 1:3000Up to 1:5000
Forex major pairs1:30001:5000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for Uzbekistan Traders
Traders in Uzbekistan typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassFBSIC MarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+FBS
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesFBS
Crypto CFDs30+20+FBS
Stocks / Share CFDsIC Markets
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformFBSIC Markets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Both FBS and IC Markets offer the MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5) platforms, which are widely used by Uzbekistan traders. IC Markets also provides cTrader, a platform favored for its advanced charting and order execution. FBS offers a proprietary web platform and a mobile app with social trading features. For Uzbekistan traders who prioritize fast execution and advanced tools, IC Markets' cTrader and raw ECN environment are superior. FBS is better for beginners who prefer a simpler interface and integrated educational resources. Both platforms are available in multiple languages, including Russian, which is commonly used in Uzbekistan.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorFBSIC MarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNIC Markets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msFBS
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

IC Markets is renowned for its ultra-fast execution, with average speeds of 40ms on its raw ECN servers, making it ideal for scalpers and algorithmic traders in Uzbekistan. FBS offers decent execution with speeds around 100ms, which is sufficient for most retail traders but may cause slippage during high volatility. IC Markets uses No Dealing Desk (NDD) execution, while FBS uses a hybrid model with some dealing desk intervention. For Uzbekistan traders requiring precision and speed, IC Markets is the clear winner.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for Uzbekistan Traders

Safety FactorFBSIC Markets
Primary regulatorIFSCASIC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

IC Markets is regulated by top-tier authorities including the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), offering strong client protection through segregated accounts and compensation schemes. FBS is regulated by the International Financial Services Commission (IFSC) in Belize, which is considered a lower-tier regulator. Neither broker is regulated by the local financial regulator of Uzbekistan, meaning traders do not have direct recourse to a local ombudsman. For Uzbekistan traders seeking higher regulatory safety, IC Markets is the more secure choice, while FBS offers more flexibility and fewer restrictions on leverage and trading styles.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for Uzbekistan traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for Uzbekistan

Payment MethodFBSIC Markets
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeElectronic Wallets / Systems: Credited immediately to 30 minutes (processed 24/7 by the financial department).Cryptocurrency: Instant, though subject to blockchain network confirmations.Credit / Debit Cards: Average of 3 to 4 business days (internal processing takes 15–20 minutes, plus bank clearance).Bank Transfers: Usually processed within 7 to 10 business days.E-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days

Both FBS and IC Markets support multiple deposit and withdrawal methods popular in Uzbekistan. Bank Transfer is available for both, though processing times can take 1-3 business days. Skrill and Neteller offer instant deposits and fast withdrawals, making them ideal for active traders. USDT TRC20 is also supported by both brokers, providing a low-cost, fast option for crypto-savvy Uzbekistan traders. FBS additionally supports Perfect Money and local bank transfers, while IC Markets accepts credit/debit cards and PayPal. Minimum deposits are low: FBS starts at $10, IC Markets at $200. Withdrawals are processed within 24 hours for e-wallets and USDT, while bank transfers may take longer. No deposit fees are charged by either broker, but intermediary bank fees may apply.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for Uzbekistan Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureFBSIC Markets
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Both FBS and IC Markets offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for Muslim traders in Uzbekistan, in compliance with Sharia law that prohibits interest (riba). FBS provides Islamic accounts on all account types, including Standard, Cent, and Zero Spread accounts, with no swap fees on overnight positions. IC Markets offers Islamic accounts on Standard and Raw Spread accounts, but not on its cTrader platform. It's important to note that Islamic accounts may have reduced leverage or holding period limits. For Uzbekistan traders seeking a swap-free trading environment, both brokers are suitable, but FBS offers more account type flexibility.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesFBS

FBS provides 24/7 customer support in multiple languages, including Russian and Uzbek, via live chat, email, and phone. IC Markets offers 24/5 support in English and Russian, with live chat and email available. For Uzbekistan traders, FBS has an edge with dedicated support in the local language and faster response times. IC Markets' support is professional but may have longer wait times during peak hours.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureFBSIC MarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsFBS
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsFBS
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileTie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceFBSIC MarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)WeeklyFBS
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicFBS

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
FBS
★★★★★
9.2K
9,222 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
IC Markets
★★★★★
54.4K
54,430 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

FBS

Pros
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support

IC Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-$200 min deposit
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - Uzbekistan Guide

Choose FBS if you...

  • Are a beginner trader looking for a user-friendly platform and educational resources.
  • Prefer low minimum deposits ($10) and flexible account types.
  • Want Islamic accounts available on all account types.
  • Value local language support in Uzbek or Russian.

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • Are an experienced trader seeking ultra-low spreads and fast execution.
  • Trade high volumes and need ECN pricing with low commissions.
  • Prefer a broker regulated by top-tier authorities like ASIC or CySEC.
  • Use automated trading strategies or cTrader platform.

FAQ - FBS vs IC Markets in Uzbekistan

Is FBS or IC Markets better for Uzbekistan? +
Can Uzbekistan traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for Uzbekistan traders? +
How do Uzbekistan traders deposit at FBS and IC Markets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for Uzbekistan? +

Final Verdict - Uzbekistan 2026

FBS wins overall

For Uzbekistan traders, the choice between FBS and IC Markets depends on your experience and trading style. IC Markets (score 4.8/5) is the superior broker for active, cost-conscious traders who prioritize low spreads, fast execution, and strong regulation. FBS (score 3.7/5) is better for beginners and those who value local support, low minimum deposits, and flexible account options. Both brokers support popular deposit methods like Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT TRC20, making them accessible to Uzbekistan residents. However, neither is regulated by the local financial regulator of Uzbekistan, so traders should consider the regulatory trade-off. If you are serious about trading and want institutional-grade conditions, choose IC Markets. If you are just starting out or prefer a more supportive environment, FBS is a solid choice.

Open FBSOpen IC Markets
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for Uzbekistan traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
FBS Winner3.7/5
IC Markets 3.6/5
Similar Comparisons
Fbs Vs ExnessIc Markets Vs ExnessFbs Vs Xm GroupIc Markets Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in Uzbekistan
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.