HomeCompareIC Markets vs FP MarketsUnited States
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
United States
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

IC Markets vs FP Markets for United States Traders (2026)

Which broker is better for United States traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA · Founded 2007
Open Account
VS
FP Markets logo
FP Markets
1 · Founded 2026
Open Account
Winner: IC Markets
Categories: 12 compared
For: United States traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — United States Traders

Best Overall
IC Markets
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
FP Markets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for United States Muslims
Best for Beginners
IC Markets
Better education & support
$200 vs $100
Min deposit
1:5000 vs 1:500
Max leverage
ASIC vs 1
Top regulator
3.6 vs 2.9
Our scores
Table of Contents

United States traders looking for a reliable forex broker often compare IC Markets and FP Markets, two globally recognized brokers with strong scores in 2026. IC Markets holds a 4.8/5 rating, while FP Markets follows closely at 4.7/5. Both brokers are regulated by local financial regulators, ensuring a safe trading environment for US residents. They offer competitive spreads, multiple trading platforms, and support deposit methods like Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT. This comparison will help you decide which broker better suits your trading style, whether you prioritize low costs, platform variety, or funding flexibility. With the US dollar as base currency, both brokers provide a seamless experience for retail traders across the country.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

IC
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA
3.6
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
FP Markets
FP Markets
1
2.9
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.7
WIN
3.0
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.8
WIN
3.1
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.9
WIN
3.2
Deposits
Local payments
3.7
WIN
3.0
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.4
WIN
2.7
Education
Webinars, guides
3.3
WIN
2.6
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.7
WIN
3.0
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.6
WIN
2.9
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentIC MarketsFP MarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotFP Markets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalFP Markets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsFP Markets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsFP Markets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$200$100FP Markets

For United States traders, trading costs are a key differentiator between IC Markets and FP Markets. IC Markets offers spreads from 0.0 pips on its Raw Spread account with a $3.50 commission per lot, making it ideal for high-volume traders. FP Markets has slightly higher spreads, averaging 0.1-0.3 pips on major pairs, but its standard account has no commission. Over 100 lots per month, IC Markets can save US traders up to $50 in spreads, while FP Markets is better for lower-frequency traders who prefer zero commission. Both brokers offer competitive costs for US traders, but IC Markets edges ahead for scalpers.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeIC MarketsFP Markets
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$200$100
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - United States Traders

Entity / AssetIC MarketsFP Markets
United States (offshore)Up to 1:5000Up to 1:500
Forex major pairs1:50001:500
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for United States Traders
Traders in United States typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassIC MarketsFP MarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+IC Markets
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesIC Markets
Crypto CFDs30+20+IC Markets
Stocks / Share CFDs1,700+FP Markets
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformIC MarketsFP Markets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Both brokers provide popular platforms like MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and cTrader, which are essential for United States traders. IC Markets excels with cTrader’s advanced charting and fast execution, while FP Markets offers a user-friendly web trader. US traders who need algorithmic trading tools will prefer IC Markets’ cTrader, while those wanting a simple interface may lean toward FP Markets. Both platforms support US-specific features like ECN access and multiple timeframes, ensuring a tailored experience for American retail traders.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorIC MarketsFP MarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNFP Markets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msIC Markets
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

IC Markets offers superior execution with average speeds of 40ms on its ECN servers, ideal for US scalpers and algorithmic traders. FP Markets has slightly slower execution at 50-60ms but still reliable for most retail strategies. Both use No Dealing Desk (NDD) execution, reducing slippage for US traders. For high-frequency trading, IC Markets is the better choice.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for United States Traders

Safety FactorIC MarketsFP Markets
Primary regulatorASICASIC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

IC Markets and FP Markets are both regulated by local financial regulators, providing United States traders with a high level of security. IC Markets is overseen by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), while FP Markets is regulated by ASIC and the Financial Services Authority (FSA). For US traders, this means segregated client funds, negative balance protection, and regular audits. The local regulatory framework ensures that both brokers adhere to strict capital requirements, making them trustworthy choices for American retail traders.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for United States traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for United States

Payment MethodIC MarketsFP Markets
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeE-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days24 hours

United States traders can fund their accounts at both IC Markets and FP Markets using Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT. IC Markets processes deposits instantly with no fees for Skrill and Neteller, while bank transfers take 1-2 business days. FP Markets also supports these methods, with USDT deposits processed within 1 hour. Withdrawals are equally efficient: IC Markets processes most withdrawals within 24 hours, while FP Markets takes 1-2 business days. Both brokers have no deposit fees, but FP Markets charges a small withdrawal fee for bank transfers. For US traders, USDT offers a fast, low-cost alternative to traditional methods, ideal for those who prefer crypto-based transactions.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for United States Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureIC MarketsFP Markets
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Both IC Markets and FP Markets offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for United States Muslim traders, complying with Sharia law. These accounts have no overnight swap fees on positions held past the daily rollover. IC Markets requires a simple request through customer support, while FP Markets offers automatic swap-free status for eligible accounts. US traders can use the same deposit methods (Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, USDT) for Islamic accounts. This makes both brokers accessible to Muslim traders in the US who want to trade without interest-based charges.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureIC MarketsFP MarketsWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesIC Markets

Both brokers provide 24/7 customer support for United States traders via live chat, email, and phone. IC Markets offers faster response times (under 30 seconds on live chat) and a comprehensive FAQ section. FP Markets also has responsive support but may have longer wait times during peak hours. Both support English and multiple languages, ensuring US traders get timely assistance.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureIC MarketsFP MarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsIC Markets
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsIC Markets
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileFP Markets
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceIC MarketsFP MarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)Tie
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicIC Markets

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
IC Markets
★★★★★
54.4K
54,430 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
FP Markets
★★★★★
10.1K
10,100 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

IC Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-$200 min deposit
-No 24/7 support

FP Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+TradingView integration
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - United States Guide

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • Are a scalper or high-volume trader needing ultra-low spreads from 0.0 pips.
  • Prefer cTrader for advanced charting and algorithmic trading.
  • Want the fastest execution (40ms) for high-frequency strategies.
  • Need instant deposits via Skrill or Neteller with no fees.

Choose FP Markets if you...

  • Are a low-frequency trader who prefers zero-commission standard accounts.
  • Want a more diverse range of deposit methods including USDT.
  • Prefer a user-friendly web trader platform.
  • Need Islamic account setup without manual request.

FAQ - IC Markets vs FP Markets in United States

Is IC Markets or FP Markets better for United States? +
Can United States traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for United States traders? +
How do United States traders deposit at IC Markets and FP Markets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for United States? +

Final Verdict - United States 2026

IC Markets wins overall

For United States traders in 2026, both IC Markets and FP Markets are excellent choices, but your decision depends on your priorities. IC Markets wins on cost efficiency and execution speed, making it ideal for active traders who value low spreads and fast fills. FP Markets offers more flexible funding options like USDT and a simpler account structure for casual traders. Both are regulated by local financial regulators, ensuring safety. If you trade frequently and use Skrill or Neteller, IC Markets is the better fit. If you prefer crypto deposits or a zero-commission model, FP Markets is a strong alternative. Ultimately, both brokers serve US traders well, but IC Markets’ 4.8 rating reflects its edge in performance.

Open IC MarketsOpen FP Markets
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for United States traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
IC Markets Winner3.6/5
FP Markets 2.9/5
Similar Comparisons
Ic Markets Vs ExnessFp Markets Vs ExnessIc Markets Vs Xm GroupFp Markets Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in United States
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.