Joseph Oloo
Written by
Alia Mehmood
Fact-checked by
Updated October 2026Country Japan
Data verified
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

IC Markets Vs Fxtm 2026: Comprehensive Comparison For Japan Traders

Which broker is better for Japan traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

IC Markets logo
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA · Founded 2007
Open Account
VS
FXTM logo
FXTM
FCA · CySEC · FSCA · Founded 2011
Open Account
Winner: FXTM
Categories: 12 compared
For: Japan traders
Updated: October 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — Japan Traders

Best Overall
FXTM
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
FXTM
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for Japan Muslims
Best for Beginners
FXTM
Better education & support
$200 vs $50
Min deposit
1:5000 vs 1:5000
Max leverage
ASIC vs FCA
Top regulator
3.6 vs 3.7
Our scores
Table of Contents

Head-to-head comparison

For Japanese retail traders navigating the forex market, choosing between IC Markets and FXTM is a critical decision that impacts trading costs, platform experience, and overall profitability. IC Markets, with an impressive 4.8/5 rating, is renowned for its ultra-low spreads and institutional-grade execution, making it a top choice for scalpers and high-volume traders in Japan. FXTM, scoring 4.3/5, balances competitive pricing with a strong educational focus and user-friendly platforms, appealing to beginners and intermediate traders. Both brokers accept Japanese clients through offshore entities, supporting local payment methods like Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT, which are essential for seamless deposits and withdrawals. While neither is regulated by the local financial regulator (JFSA), they hold licenses from respected international bodies, offering a safe trading environment. This comparison dives into spreads, platforms, regulation, and deposit options tailored to Japan traders, helping you decide which broker aligns with your trading style and goals in 2026.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

IC Markets logo
IC Markets
ASIC · CySEC · FSA
3.6
CompareBroker score
VS
FXTM logo
FXTM
FCA · CySEC · FSCA
3.7
CompareBroker score
Winner
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
3.7
3.8
WIN
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
3.8
WIN
3.4
Regulation
Safety, oversight
3.9
4.0
WIN
Deposits
Local payments
3.7
3.8
WIN
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
3.4
3.5
WIN
Education
Webinars, guides
3.3
3.8
WIN
Execution
Speed, slippage
3.7
3.8
WIN
Mobile App
iOS, Android
3.6
3.7
WIN
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentIC MarketsFXTMWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotFXTM
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalFXTM
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsFXTM
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsFXTM
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$200$50IC Markets

IC Markets clearly leads in trading costs for Japan traders, offering spreads from 0.0 pips on its Raw Spread account with a $3.5 commission per lot per side. FXTM’s Standard account has spreads from 1.3 pips with no commission, while its Advantage account tightens spreads but adds a commission. For a Japanese trader executing 10 standard lots per month on USD/JPY, IC Markets can save hundreds of dollars in spread costs compared to FXTM. Volume traders benefit significantly from IC Markets’ lower overall cost structure, though FXTM’s simplicity may appeal to those trading smaller sizes. Both brokers offer competitive pricing, but IC Markets is more cost-effective for active trading.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeIC MarketsFXTM
Standard account✓✓
ECN / Raw spread✓✓
Islamic (swap-free)✓✓
Demo account✓✓
PAMM / MAM account✓✓
Zero spread account✓✗
Copy trading✗✓
Min deposit$200$50
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - Japan Traders

Entity / AssetIC MarketsFXTM
Japan (offshore)Up to 1:5000Up to 1:5000
Forex major pairs1:50001:5000
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for Japan Traders
Traders in Japan typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassIC MarketsFXTMWinner
Forex pairs90+65+IC Markets
Gold (XAU/USD)✓✓Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)✓✓Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesIC Markets
Crypto CFDs30+✗IC Markets
Stocks / Share CFDs✗✗FXTM
ETFs✗✗Tie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformIC MarketsFXTM
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)✓✓
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)✓✓
cTrader✓✗
TradingView✗✗
Expert Advisors (EAs)✓✓
Scalping allowed✓✓
Hedging allowed✓✓

IC Markets provides MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and cTrader, all popular among Japanese traders for their advanced charting and algorithmic trading capabilities. FXTM offers MT4 and MT5, plus its proprietary FXTM Trader app for mobile trading. Japanese traders who prioritize custom indicators and automated trading will prefer IC Markets’ cTrader integration, while FXTM’s platform is more intuitive for beginners. Both support VPS hosting for low-latency trading, essential for scalpers in Japan. Platform stability and execution speed are excellent on both, but IC Markets edges ahead with cTrader’s depth of market.

⚡

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorIC MarketsFXTMWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNFXTM
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msIC Markets
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowed✓✓Tie
EA / Bot trading✓✓Tie

IC Markets is known for its ultra-fast execution with no requotes, leveraging Equinix NY4 data centers and low-latency infrastructure. FXTM also offers reliable execution but may experience occasional slippage during volatile markets. For Japanese scalpers and high-frequency traders, IC Markets’ execution quality is superior, with average speeds under 30 milliseconds. FXTM’s execution is still excellent for most retail traders, but IC Markets is the clear winner for precision and speed.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for Japan Traders

Safety FactorIC MarketsFXTM
Primary regulatorASICFCA
Top-tier regulated✓✓
Investor protection✓✓
Segregated funds✓✓
Neg. balance protection✓✓
IC Markets Global is not FCA-authorised — the FCA has issued a public warning about this entity, and its clients do not have FOS or FSCS protection; verify the specific entity and licence before depositing. Neither broker is regulated by Japan’s local financial regulator (JFSA), meaning Japanese traders do not benefit from local investor protection schemes. However, both adhere to strict international standards, including negative balance protection and client fund segregation.
Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for Japan traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for Japan

Payment MethodIC MarketsFXTM
Bank Wire Transfer✓✓
Visa / Mastercard✓✓
Skrill✓✓
Neteller✓✓
USDT / Crypto✓✓
Withdrawal timeE-wallets instant-24hrs; Cards 3-5 business days (up to 10); Int'l bank wire up to 14 days24 hours (often in 30 minutes),Credit / Debit Cards (Visa, Mastercard): 1 to 3 business days.

Japan traders can fund their accounts at both IC Markets and FXTM using Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT. Bank Transfer is reliable for large deposits but may take 1-3 business days, while Skrill and Neteller offer instant transfers with low fees. USDT (Tether) provides a fast, anonymous crypto option, ideal for tech-savvy traders. Minimum deposits are around $50 for IC Markets and $100 for FXTM, though this varies by method. Withdrawals are processed within 24 hours for e-wallets and 2-5 days for bank transfers. Both brokers do not charge internal fees, but third-party bank charges may apply. Overall, the payment options are well-suited for Japanese traders seeking flexibility and speed.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for Japan Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureIC MarketsFXTM
Swap-free available✓✓
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported✓✓
How to applyContact supportContact support

Both IC Markets and FXTM offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for Japanese Muslim traders who require compliance with Sharia law. IC Markets provides swap-free accounts on all account types with a minimum deposit of $50, while FXTM offers them on its Standard and Advantage accounts. These accounts eliminate overnight swap fees, making them suitable for long-term position traders. Traders should note that Islamic accounts may have restrictions on holding positions over weekends or certain instruments. Both brokers require a request for activation, and FXTM may charge a small administrative fee after a certain period. Overall, both cater well to Muslim traders in Japan.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureIC MarketsFXTMWinner
Live chat✓✓Tie
Phone support✓✓Tie
Email support✓✓Tie
24/7 support✗✗Tie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesIC Markets

IC Markets offers 24/7 customer support via live chat, email, and phone, with multilingual agents including Japanese language support. FXTM provides similar channels with 24/5 support and a dedicated Japanese helpdesk. Response times are fast on both, but IC Markets’ round-the-clock availability is an advantage for night traders in Japan. FXTM excels with comprehensive educational resources and webinars in Japanese, enhancing the support experience. Both brokers have extensive FAQ sections on their websites.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureIC MarketsFXTMWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsIC Markets
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsIC Markets
Biometric login✓✓Tie
Push notifications✓✓Tie
Full charting on mobile✓✓Tie
TradingView mobile✗✗Tie
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceIC MarketsFXTMWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)✗MonthlyTie
Economic calendar✓✓Tie
Market analysisDailyBasicIC Markets
⭐

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
IC Markets
☆☆☆☆☆
—
54,430 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
FXTM
☆☆☆☆☆
—
1,073 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

IC Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-$200 min deposit
-No 24/7 support

FXTM

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - Japan Guide

Choose IC Markets if you...

  • Are a scalper or high-volume trader seeking the lowest spreads and commissions
  • Prefer advanced platforms like cTrader for algorithmic trading
  • Trade major pairs like USD/JPY and need fast execution
  • Value 24/7 customer support and a wide range of deposit methods including USDT

Choose FXTM if you...

  • Are a beginner or intermediate trader looking for educational resources
  • Prefer a user-friendly platform with mobile trading apps
  • Trade smaller volumes and want no-commission accounts
  • Need Islamic account options with flexible terms
❓

FAQ - IC Markets vs FXTM in Japan

Is IC Markets or FXTM better for Japan?

+

Can Japan traders use both brokers legally?

+

Which broker has lower spreads for Japan traders?

+

How do Japan traders deposit at IC Markets and FXTM?

+

Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for Japan?

+

Final Verdict - Japan 2026

FXTM wins overall

For Japanese retail traders, IC Markets is the superior choice for active trading due to its lower spreads, faster execution, and higher overall rating (4.8/5). It excels in cost efficiency, especially for volume traders using USD/JPY, and supports local payment methods like Bank Transfer, Skrill, Neteller, and USDT smoothly. FXTM (3.7/5) remains a strong contender for beginners and those who prioritize education and simplicity. While neither is regulated by the local financial regulator (JFSA), both are reputable offshore brokers. Ultimately, IC Markets is best for cost-conscious scalpers, while FXTM suits traders seeking a balanced experience with learning tools. Consider your trading style and volume when making your choice in 2026.

Open IC MarketsOpen FXTM
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of October 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for Japan traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
IC Markets 3.6/5
FXTM Winner3.7/5
Full Reviews
Full IC Markets Review →Full FXTM Review →
Similar Comparisons
IC Markets vs ExnessExness vs FXTMIC Markets vs XM GroupXM Group vs FXTMIC Markets vs FP MarketsFP Markets vs FXTM
Best Brokers in Japan
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.
Investing.comForbesFX StreetNASDAQ