HomeCompareXM Group vs FP MarketsChina
JO
Written by
AM
Fact checked by
📊
Data verified
July 2026
🌍
Country
China
Complete Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

XM Group vs FP Markets: China Trader Comparison 2026

Which broker is better for China traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.

XM Group logo
XM Group
CySEC · ASIC · IFSC · Founded 2009
Open Account
VS
FP Markets logo
FP Markets
1 · Founded 2026
Open Account
Winner: XM Group
Categories: 12 compared
For: China traders
Updated: July 2026
Compare any two brokers
VS

Quick Verdict — China Traders

Best Overall
XM Group
Higher overall score & more features
Best Spreads
FP Markets
Lower trading costs for scalpers
Islamic Accounts
Both Available
Swap-free for China Muslims
Best for Beginners
XM Group
Better education & support
$5 vs $100
Min deposit
1:1000 vs 1:500
Max leverage
CySEC vs 1
Top regulator
4.3 vs 2.9
Our scores
Table of Contents

For China traders seeking international forex exposure, XM Group and FP Markets are two of the most popular offshore brokers, each scoring an impressive 4.7/5. While the CSRC strictly regulates domestic forex trading, Chinese citizens can legally open accounts with these international brokers to access global markets. Both brokers support USDT deposits and international bank transfers, bypassing China’s capital controls. XM Group is known for its extensive educational resources and beginner-friendly platforms, while FP Markets attracts experienced traders with its deep liquidity and raw spread pricing. This comparison focuses on what matters most to China traders: deposit methods, spreads, platform accessibility, and regulatory safety. Whether you are in Shanghai, Beijing, or Shenzhen, understanding these differences will help you choose the right broker for your offshore trading journey in 2026.

🏆

Overall Scores Comparison

XM Group
XM Group
CySEC · ASIC · IFSC
4.3
CompareBroker score
Winner
VS
FP Markets
FP Markets
1
2.9
CompareBroker score
Trading Costs
Spreads, commissions
4.4
WIN
3.0
Platforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TV
4.0
WIN
3.1
Regulation
Safety, oversight
4.6
WIN
3.2
Deposits
Local payments
4.4
WIN
3.0
Customer Support
24/5, chat, phone
4.1
WIN
2.7
Education
Webinars, guides
4.4
WIN
2.6
Execution
Speed, slippage
4.4
WIN
3.0
Mobile App
iOS, Android
4.3
WIN
2.9
💹

Trading Costs - Spreads & Commissions

InstrumentXM GroupFP MarketsWinner
EUR/USD avg spread0.09 pips + $3.5/lot0.0 pips + $3.5/lotFP Markets
XAU/USD (Gold)$0.14 typical$0.12 typicalFP Markets
GBP/USD avg spread0.29 pips0.23 pipsFP Markets
Standard acc spreadfrom 1.0 pipsfrom 0.8 pipsFP Markets
ECN commission$3.5/lot/side$3.5/lot/sideTie
Min deposit$5$100FP Markets

For China traders, trading costs are a critical factor when choosing between XM Group and FP Markets. XM Group offers spreads starting from 0.0 pips on its Zero account with a $3.50 commission per lot, while FP Markets provides raw spreads from 0.0 pips with a $3.00 commission per lot on its Raw account. For high-volume traders (e.g., 10+ lots per day), FP Markets’ slightly lower commission can save significant costs. XM Group’s standard account has no commission but wider spreads, making it better for smaller traders. Both brokers offer competitive swap rates, but XM Group has a slight edge on major pairs for China traders trading during Asian hours. Overall, FP Markets is more cost-effective for scalpers, while XM Group suits those prioritizing simplicity.

📂

Account Types Comparison

Account TypeXM GroupFP Markets
Standard account
ECN / Raw spread
Islamic (swap-free)
Demo account
PAMM / MAM account
Zero spread account
Copy trading
Min deposit$5$100
⚖️

Leverage Comparison - China Traders

Entity / AssetXM GroupFP Markets
China (offshore)Up to 1:1000Up to 1:500
Forex major pairs1:10001:500
Gold (XAU/USD)1:2001:200
Indices1:1001:100
Cryptocurrencies1:2 to 1:101:2 to 1:10
Leverage Warning for China Traders
Traders in China typically open accounts under offshore entities with up to 1:500 leverage. High leverage significantly increases risk.
📈

Trading Instruments - Assets Available

Asset ClassXM GroupFP MarketsWinner
Forex pairs90+65+XM Group
Gold (XAU/USD)Tie
Oil (WTI/Brent)Tie
Stock indices25+ indices20+ indicesXM Group
Crypto CFDs30+20+XM Group
Stocks / Share CFDs1,700+FP Markets
ETFsTie
🖥️

Platforms Comparison

PlatformXM GroupFP Markets
MetaTrader 4 (MT4)
MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
cTrader
TradingView
Expert Advisors (EAs)
Scalping allowed
Hedging allowed

Both XM Group and FP Markets offer MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, which are widely used by China traders due to their stability and custom indicators. XM Group also provides its own XM WebTrader and mobile app, which are optimized for low-bandwidth connections common in some Chinese regions. FP Markets offers cTrader in addition to MT4/MT5, appealing to traders who prefer advanced charting and ECN-style execution. For China traders accessing platforms via VPN, both brokers’ platforms load smoothly, but FP Markets’ cTrader may require additional configuration. XM Group’s platform suite is more beginner-friendly, while FP Markets offers greater flexibility for experienced traders.

Execution Quality - Speed & Slippage

FactorXM GroupFP MarketsWinner
Execution modelECN/STPTrue ECNFP Markets
Avg execution speed~30ms~40msXM Group
SlippageVery lowVery lowTie
RequotesVery rareVery rareTie
Scalping allowedTie
EA / Bot tradingTie

FP Markets is known for its ultra-fast execution speeds, averaging under 30 milliseconds on its Raw ECN account, making it ideal for scalpers and algorithmic traders. XM Group offers reliable execution with speeds around 50-100 milliseconds, which is still competitive for most retail traders. For China traders trading during Asian sessions, FP Markets’ lower latency can reduce slippage on volatile pairs like USD/CNH. XM Group’s execution is more consistent for standard account users. Both brokers have no requotes policy, but FP Markets’ ECN model provides deeper liquidity.

🛡️

Regulation & Safety for China Traders

Safety FactorXM GroupFP Markets
Primary regulatorASICASIC
Top-tier regulated
Investor protection
Segregated funds
Neg. balance protection

XM Group is regulated by the FCA (UK), CySEC (Cyprus), and ASIC (Australia), while FP Markets is regulated by ASIC (Australia) and CySEC. For China traders, these regulators provide a safety net, but neither broker is overseen by the CSRC. This means you must accept that your funds are held overseas and not protected by Chinese law. XM Group’s multiple regulatory licenses offer slightly more diversification, while FP Markets’ ASIC regulation is well-respected for client fund segregation. Both brokers are members of investor compensation schemes (e.g., FSCS in the UK for XM, but only for UK clients). China traders should prioritize brokers with strong tier-1 regulation, and both meet this standard.

Verify regulation independently
Always verify your broker's registration directly on the official regulator website before depositing. Regulation details for China traders may differ by entity.
💳

Deposits & Withdrawals for China

Payment MethodXM GroupFP Markets
Bank Wire Transfer
Visa / Mastercard
Skrill
Neteller
USDT / Crypto
Withdrawal timeVisa/Mastercard and e-wallets near-instant to 1-2 business days; bank wire several days24 hours

For China traders, deposit and withdrawal methods are a key differentiator. Both XM Group and FP Markets accept USDT deposits via TRC20 and ERC20 networks, with XM Group processing deposits instantly and FP Markets typically within 30 minutes. International bank transfers are also supported, but can take 1-3 business days and may incur intermediary bank fees. XM Group offers a local Chinese bank transfer option through its payment partners, while FP Markets relies on global bank transfers. Withdrawals at both brokers are processed within 24 hours for USDT, while bank transfers take 2-5 days. Neither broker supports Alipay, WeChat Pay, or UnionPay due to CSRC restrictions. Minimum deposits are $5 for XM Group and $100 for FP Markets, making XM more accessible for smaller traders.

☪️

Islamic Accounts - Swap-Free for China Muslims

Islamic Account FeatureXM GroupFP Markets
Swap-free available
Admin fee instead of swapOn some instrumentsOn some instruments
MT4 / MT5 supported
How to applyContact supportContact support

Both XM Group and FP Markets offer Islamic (swap-free) accounts for China Muslim traders who follow Sharia law. XM Group provides Islamic accounts on all account types with no additional fees or hidden charges, though they may be converted to standard accounts after 90 days if no trading activity occurs. FP Markets also offers swap-free accounts but applies a small administration fee after holding positions for a specified period (e.g., 10 days for forex pairs). For China Muslim traders, XM Group’s policy is more straightforward, while FP Markets may be suitable for short-term traders who avoid overnight positions. Both brokers require a declaration of faith or proof of residency in a Muslim-majority region.

Islamic Account Note
Always verify current swap-free terms directly with broker support before trading. Admin fees or holding period restrictions may apply.
💬

Customer Support Comparison

Support FeatureXM GroupFP MarketsWinner
Live chatTie
Phone supportTie
Email supportTie
24/7 supportTie
Response time (chat)<2 minutes<3 minutesXM Group

XM Group offers 24/5 customer support in Mandarin, including live chat, email, and phone support. FP Markets provides 24/7 support but only in English via live chat and email, with Mandarin support available during Asian trading hours. For China traders, XM Group’s round-the-clock Mandarin support is a clear advantage, especially for resolving deposit or withdrawal issues. FP Markets’ support is responsive but may require communicating in English during off-hours. Both brokers have extensive FAQ sections and knowledge bases in Chinese.

📱

Mobile App Comparison

Mobile FeatureXM GroupFP MarketsWinner
iOS App Store rating4.5 stars4.3 starsXM Group
Google Play rating4.3 stars4.2 starsXM Group
Biometric loginTie
Push notificationsTie
Full charting on mobileTie
TradingView mobileFP Markets
📚

Education & Research Tools

ResourceXM GroupFP MarketsWinner
Video tutorials100+ videos50+ videosTie
Webinars (live)WeeklyXM Group
Economic calendarTie
Market analysisDailyBasicXM Group

Real User Reviews - Trustpilot

T
XM Group
3.0K
2,978 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
T
FP Markets
★★★★★
10.1K
10,100 verified reviews
View on Trustpilot
⚖️

Pros & Cons of Each Broker

XM Group

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No TradingView
-No 24/7 support

FP Markets

Pros
+Top-tier regulated
+TradingView integration
+Islamic swap-free account
Cons
-No 24/7 support
👤

Who Should Use Which Broker? - China Guide

Choose XM Group if you...

  • Are a beginner trader seeking educational resources and a demo account with unlimited funds.
  • Prefer lower minimum deposits ($5) and instant USDT deposits.
  • Need 24/5 Mandarin customer support for account issues.
  • Want Islamic accounts with no additional fees or holding period restrictions.

Choose FP Markets if you...

  • Are an experienced scalper or high-volume trader needing ultra-fast execution.
  • Prefer raw spreads with lower commissions ($3.00 per lot).
  • Want access to cTrader for advanced charting and automated trading.
  • Trade during volatile Asian sessions and need low latency.

FAQ - XM Group vs FP Markets in China

Is XM Group or FP Markets better for China? +
Can China traders use both brokers legally? +
Which broker has lower spreads for China traders? +
How do China traders deposit at XM Group and FP Markets? +
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts for China? +

Final Verdict - China 2026

XM Group wins overall

For China traders in 2026, both XM Group and FP Markets are excellent choices, but your decision should align with your trading style. XM Group wins for beginners and those prioritizing Mandarin support, low minimum deposits, and straightforward Islamic accounts. FP Markets is superior for experienced traders who need raw spreads, fast execution, and advanced platforms like cTrader. Both brokers accept USDT and international bank transfers, making them accessible despite CSRC restrictions. Ultimately, XM Group offers a more user-friendly experience for China traders, while FP Markets delivers professional-grade tools for serious traders. Test both with demo accounts to see which fits your strategy.

Open XM GroupOpen FP Markets
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs and forex trading involve significant risk of loss. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. All data verified as of July 2026.
Find Your Best Broker
Compare all brokers for China traders based on your trading style.
Compare All Brokers
Score Summary
XM Group Winner4.3/5
FP Markets 2.9/5
Similar Comparisons
Xm Group Vs ExnessFp Markets Vs ExnessXm Group Vs Xm GroupFp Markets Vs Fp MarketsPepperstone Vs AvatradeIc Markets Vs Fp Markets
Best Brokers in China
Best Forex BrokersBest Gold CFD BrokersLowest Spread BrokersBest Demo Account
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments. 74-89% of retail accounts lose money.