Which broker is better for Australia traders in 2026? Expert analysis across 12 categories.
For Australian traders seeking an ASIC-regulated broker, the choice between Oanda and XM Group comes down to trading style, cost sensitivity, and platform needs. Oanda, with a score of 3.6/5, is well known among experienced traders for its transparent pricing, powerful trading tools, and deep liquidity – making it a favourite for those who rely on charting and technical analysis. XM Group, scoring 4.7/5, has built a strong reputation in Australia for its tight spreads, low minimum deposits (as low as $5 AUD), and extensive local payment options including BPAY and POLi. Both brokers hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) and are subject to ASIC leverage limits (1:30 for retail clients). However, their fee structures, platform ecosystems, and deposit/withdrawal support differ significantly. This comparison breaks down how each broker serves the unique needs of Australian forex and CFD traders, helping you decide which one aligns better with your trading goals and local preferences.
| Instrument | Oanda | XM Group | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD avg spread | 0.09 pips + $3.5/lot | 0.0 pips + $3.5/lot | XM Group |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | $0.14 typical | $0.12 typical | XM Group |
| GBP/USD avg spread | 0.29 pips | 0.23 pips | XM Group |
| Standard acc spread | from 1.0 pips | from 0.8 pips | XM Group |
| ECN commission | $3.5/lot/side | $3.5/lot/side | Tie |
| Min deposit | $0 | $5 | Oanda |
Spread costs are a critical factor for Australian traders, especially those trading AUD-denominated pairs. XM Group offers floating spreads on its Standard account from 0.6 pips on major pairs, and even tighter spreads on its Zero account (from 0.0 pips with a commission). Oanda’s spreads are also variable but tend to be slightly wider – often around 0.8–1.0 pips on AUD/USD during peak hours. For high-volume traders, XM Group’s spread structure becomes more cost-effective, particularly for larger trade sizes where Oanda does not offer volume-based discounts. Oanda does not charge commission on standard trades, but its spreads incorporate the cost. Currency conversion fees on non-USD deposits are applied by both brokers; however, XM Group charges a 0.8% conversion fee, while Oanda’s fee is transparent but can add up for traders funding in AUD directly.
| Account Type | Oanda | XM Group |
|---|---|---|
| Standard account | ✓ | ✓ |
| ECN / Raw spread | ✓ | ✓ |
| Islamic (swap-free) | ✗ | ✓ |
| Demo account | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAMM / MAM account | ✗ | ✓ |
| Zero spread account | ✗ | ✓ |
| Copy trading | ✗ | ✗ |
| Min deposit | $0 | $5 |
| Entity / Asset | Oanda | XM Group |
|---|---|---|
| Australia (offshore) | Up to 1:100 | Up to 1:1000 |
| Forex major pairs | 1:100 | 1:1000 |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Indices | 1:100 | 1:100 |
| Cryptocurrencies | 1:2 to 1:10 | 1:2 to 1:10 |
| Asset Class | Oanda | XM Group | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex pairs | 90+ | 65+ | Oanda |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Oil (WTI/Brent) | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Stock indices | 25+ indices | 20+ indices | Oanda |
| Crypto CFDs | ✗ | 20+ | Oanda |
| Stocks / Share CFDs | ✗ | ✗ | XM Group |
| ETFs | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Platform | Oanda | XM Group |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | ✓ | ✓ |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | ✗ | ✓ |
| cTrader | ✗ | ✗ |
| TradingView | ✓ | ✗ |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | ✗ | ✓ |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hedging allowed | ✓ | ✓ |
Australian traders often demand robust platforms with advanced charting and fast execution. Oanda excels in this area with its proprietary web platform, powerful mobile app, and full integration with TradingView – a massive plus for technical traders. It also offers MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MT5, though without custom indicators out-of-the-box. XM Group provides MT4, MT5, and its own XM WebTrader, which is intuitive but less customisable than Oanda’s offering. For algorithmic traders, both support Expert Advisors (EAs) on MT4/MT5. Oanda’s platform is better suited for traders who rely on advanced technical analysis, while XM Group’s platforms are more straightforward and beginner-friendly. Both offer reliable mobile trading apps with real-time quotes and order management from Australia.
| Factor | Oanda | XM Group | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Execution model | ECN/STP | True ECN | XM Group |
| Avg execution speed | ~30ms | ~40ms | Oanda |
| Slippage | Very low | Very low | Tie |
| Requotes | Very rare | Very rare | Tie |
| Scalping allowed | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| EA / Bot trading | ✗ | ✓ | Tie |
Both brokers offer competitive execution speeds suitable for experienced traders. Oanda uses a non-dealing desk (NDD) model with no requotes, providing transparency for scalpers. Its average execution speed is around 40–60ms. XM Group also uses STP/NDD execution with no requotes on most account types, and reports an average speed of under 30ms on its MT4/MT5 servers. For Australian traders who scalp or trade news events, XM Group’s marginally faster execution and lower latency to Equinix data centres in Sydney can be beneficial. Oanda’s execution is reliable but may show slight slippage during high volatility. Both brokers ensure negative balance protection as required by ASIC.
| Safety Factor | Oanda | XM Group |
|---|---|---|
| Primary regulator | FCA | ASIC |
| Top-tier regulated | ✓ | ✓ |
| Investor protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Segregated funds | ✓ | ✓ |
| Neg. balance protection | ✓ | ✓ |
Both Oanda and XM Group are regulated by ASIC under the Corporations Act 2001, providing Australian traders with strong investor protection. Oanda holds an AFSL (number 185875) and is a large, publicly traded company (Oanda Global Corporation). XM Group is licensed under AFSL 443670 and operates under strict ASIC oversight, including mandatory client money segregation in Australian trust accounts. This means funds are protected in the event of broker insolvency, and both brokers adhere to the ASIC Retail Client Acquisition and Conduct provisions. Some XM Group entities also hold additional licenses (CySEC, IFSC), but for Australian clients, the ASIC entity is what matters. The regulatory clarity gives Australian traders confidence in fair execution and transparent fee disclosure from both firms.
| Payment Method | Oanda | XM Group |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visa / Mastercard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Skrill | ✗ | ✓ |
| Neteller | ✗ | ✓ |
| USDT / Crypto | ✗ | ✓ |
| Withdrawal time | 1 to 5 business days | Visa/Mastercard and e-wallets near-instant to 1-2 business days; bank wire several days |
Australian traders benefit from a range of deposit methods tailored to local banking. Oanda supports bank transfer and credit/debit cards (Visa, Mastercard), but notably does not offer BPAY or POLi – missing two of the most popular Australian payment options. Deposits are processed instantly with cards, while bank transfers take 1–3 business days. XM Group, on the other hand, provides BPAY, POLi, bank transfer, and credit cards, making it far more convenient for local users. BPAY deposits are processed within 1–2 hours, and POLi is instant. Both brokers offer AUD-denominated accounts, avoiding currency conversion on deposits and withdrawals. Withdrawals at XM Group are processed within 24 hours for most methods, while Oanda takes 1–2 business days for bank transfers. XM Group also does not charge withdrawal fees, whereas Oanda may apply a fee on certain bank wire transfers. Overall, XM Group’s local payment integration gives it a clear edge for Australian traders.
| Islamic Account Feature | Oanda | XM Group |
|---|---|---|
| Swap-free available | ✗ | ✓ |
| Admin fee instead of swap | On some instruments | On some instruments |
| MT4 / MT5 supported | ✓ | ✓ |
| How to apply | Contact support | Contact support |
Australian Muslim traders seeking swap-free (Islamic) accounts can use either broker. Oanda offers Islamic accounts upon request, but it may take a few days to set up, and the company does not advertise the service prominently. XM Group provides a dedicated Islamic account option during the registration process, applicable to Standard, Zero, and Ultra-Low accounts. Both brokers ensure no swap or rollover interest is charged on overnight positions, in line with Sharia principles. However, XM Group’s Islamic account is more accessible and comes with the same low spreads as regular accounts. Australian traders should note that swap-free accounts may have limited availability on certain instruments, and both brokers reserve the right to charge an admin fee if positions are held excessively long.
| Support Feature | Oanda | XM Group | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Phone support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Email support | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 24/7 support | ✗ | ✗ | Tie |
| Response time (chat) | <2 minutes | <3 minutes | Oanda |
Australian traders have access to customer support in English via live chat, email, and phone for both brokers. Oanda offers local support with Australian phone numbers during Sydney trading hours, plus a 24/5 live chat. XM Group provides 24/5 multilingual support with a dedicated Australian contact number and faster response times on live chat. XM Group also has a comprehensive FAQ and local webinar schedule tailored to Australian time zones. Oanda’s support is reliable but less targeted to Australian trading hours, with weekend support limited. For Australian traders who value quick resolution during local hours, XM Group’s support is slightly more responsive.
| Mobile Feature | Oanda | XM Group | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store rating | 4.5 stars | 4.3 stars | Oanda |
| Google Play rating | 4.3 stars | 4.2 stars | Oanda |
| Biometric login | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Push notifications | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Full charting on mobile | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| TradingView mobile | ✓ | ✗ | Oanda |
| Resource | Oanda | XM Group | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video tutorials | 100+ videos | 50+ videos | Tie |
| Webinars (live) | Weekly | Monthly | Tie |
| Economic calendar | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| Market analysis | Daily | Basic | Oanda |
Choose Oanda if you...
Choose XM Group if you...
For Australian traders, XM Group is the stronger overall choice, thanks to its higher trust score (4.7/5), lower spreads, and superior local payment support including BPAY, POLi, and bank transfers. The broker’s ASIC regulation, fast execution, and flexible account types make it suitable for both retail and experienced traders. Oanda remains a solid option for traders who prioritise advanced platform features and transparency, but its lack of BPAY/POLi, wider spreads, and lower rating put it behind XM Group in most practical categories. If you trade heavily on technical analysis and use TradingView, Oanda may still appeal. However, for the majority of Australian traders seeking cost efficiency, convenience, and regulatory safety, XM Group is the recommended broker in 2025.